A knife or baton is still generally considered deadly force.Ol Zeke wrote:For me, It's more about "less lethal".
I Agree that state law has room to grow as far as freedom for citizens to arm themselves.chabouk wrote:Arizona passing "constitutional carry", Oklahoma legalizing open carry, NH legalizing switchblades
I too carry a baton daily (almost). Depending on how you implement it - the state will most likely consider it deadly force. I know that a person would justified in shooting someone armed with some form of club, be it a bat, baton, hammer, ax handle, etc. A club by its manner of use would cause serious bodily injury - which meets the PC definition of deadly force.Grog wrote: You can use a stick "just a little", can't do that with a handgun.
People trained in PPCT or some similar form (martial arts etc) of tactics have demonstrated that they can use a baton to strike nerve motor points, and nerve motor points only. But you better be able to back it up. It is my opinion that a prosecutor will treat any club from an untrained person as deadly force...maybe even do it from a trained person.
To bring this back on topic - I feel that citizens should be able to carry whatever they want - however that is not where we are now in TX. To answer the OP's question - the CHL is exactly that, it is not a CWP. While we can speculate on ambiguities in the penal code, it is up to the LEO, prosecutor, and the grand jury as to what charges actually get filed against you. If all the CHL instructors, most LEOs, and most attorneys are telling you not to treat it as a CWP - you may want to heed that instruction.
(again - not that I agree with the spirit of those laws...but it is what we have to work with).