http://www.news-press.com/article/20100 ... f-girl--15" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

- Jim
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
I agree but I am having a very difficult time believing the story. In my mind it would take a lot of things to go just right for this to be an accident. I know, I know, I know crazy things happen everyday but this one just seems "not right". At least not to me.chefkristian wrote:1. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
2. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
3. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
4. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
5. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
I agree but I have an easier time believing someone accidentally shot and killed someone else than believing they accidentally shot and killed themself, especially with a rifle or shotgun. viewtopic.php?f=83&t=37635" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;XtremeDuty.45 wrote:I agree but I am having a very difficult time believing the story. In my mind it would take a lot of things to go just right for this to be an accident. I know, I know, I know crazy things happen everyday but this one just seems "not right". At least not to me.
The 50's were then and this is now. Age 18 is old enough to vote and serve in the military and....to know better. In some cases, by age 20 or certainly age 30, many know pretty much everything. It's only at around age 40 that terminal dumbness starts to slip in.hangfour wrote:The big thing that comes to mind, as I read the article describing this tragedy, is why did the parents have a loaded gun available to kids (teens in particular)? I was lucky as I grew up with a father who taught me (and our whole family) gun safety as soon as we were old enough to understand that dad was hunting and that he used guns to kill the game we enjoyed at dinner. As there was no perceived need for defense in the 50's, all the guns in our home were always locked up. I bet the parents feel awful ... prayers for them.
Well said!The 50's were then and this is now. Age 18 is old enough to vote and serve in the military and....to know better. In some cases, by age 20 or certainly age 30, many know pretty much everything. It's only at around age 40 that terminal dumbness starts to slip in.
I read a fascinating study which showed that the age of puberty is starting earlier and lasting significantly longer now than it did even 2 generations ago.Oldgringo wrote:The 50's were then and this is now. Age 18 is old enough to vote and serve in the military and....to know better. In some cases, by age 20 or certainly age 30, many know pretty much everything. It's only at around age 40 that terminal dumbness starts to slip in.hangfour wrote:The big thing that comes to mind, as I read the article describing this tragedy, is why did the parents have a loaded gun available to kids (teens in particular)? I was lucky as I grew up with a father who taught me (and our whole family) gun safety as soon as we were old enough to understand that dad was hunting and that he used guns to kill the game we enjoyed at dinner. As there was no perceived need for defense in the 50's, all the guns in our home were always locked up. I bet the parents feel awful ... prayers for them.
I'm with XtremeDuty.45 on this.XtremeDuty.45 wrote:I agree but I am having a very difficult time believing the story. In my mind it would take a lot of things to go just right for this to be an accident. I know, I know, I know crazy things happen everyday but this one just seems "not right". At least not to me.chefkristian wrote:1. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
2. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
3. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
4. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded
5. Did not treat the rifle as if it were loaded