The Idiocy of Legislatively Reduced Magazine Capacity

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Katygunnut
Senior Member
Posts: 710
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:34 pm

Re: The Idiocy of Legislatively Reduced Magazine Capacity

Post by Katygunnut »

Kythas wrote:
Beiruty wrote:I hear that states have came up with laws stating firearms and whatever related to it if made in the state, sold in the state, and never exported outsie the state are not subject to Federal regualation, if such laws survive a supreme court ruling, than the whole federal gun control is muzzled. The principle reasoning is that Federal gun control is only due to interstate commerce regulation.
Doesn't really matter, anyway. In Wickard v Filburn, the Supreme Court stated that producing something for your own use affects interstate commerce in that what you are producing for your own use would have otherwise been purchased via interstate commerce, and therefore Congress has the power to regulate it.

Therefore, if a company is providing a product or good solely within the State, it still affects interstate commerce since the residents of that State who are purchasing said product or good would otherwise have purchased it on the open, interstate market. Therefore, Congress has the right to regulate it via the Commerce Clause.
Wow, so congress can regulate the way that I do my own laundry, since I would otherwise have to use the laundromat, or the way that my wife and I clean the house, since we would otherwise need to hire a housekeeper. Doesn't that mean they can regulate anything that could possibly be sold (which is basically every single thing in existence)? I didn't realize that this is what the framers intended when they gave congress the power to regulate interstate commerce.
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: The Idiocy of Legislatively Reduced Magazine Capacity

Post by Purplehood »

Katygunnut wrote:Wow, so congress can regulate the way that I do my own laundry, since I would otherwise have to use the laundromat, or the way that my wife and I clean the house, since we would otherwise need to hire a housekeeper. Doesn't that mean they can regulate anything that could possibly be sold (which is basically every single thing in existence)? I didn't realize that this is what the framers intended when they gave congress the power to regulate interstate commerce.


As presently interpreted, practiced and approved repeatedly by the Supreme Court your statement is absolutely true.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: The Idiocy of Legislatively Reduced Magazine Capacity

Post by RPB »

Did you know :
Babyface Nelson was shot 17 times, then killed the 2 guys who shot him .... then went home .... only to die later that evening.


More recently:

Read the headline twice, think about it............good thing Police had enough ammo

Angel Alvarez, hit 23 times in Harlem shootout with cops, held without bail on weapons charges
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crim ... zz1BLCSaH1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Originally Published:Monday, August 16th 2010, 2:23 PM
Updated: Monday, August 16th 2010, 10:13 PM
Alvarez ended up with 23 bullet wounds, but got out of the hospital Saturday.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”