RPB wrote:Excerpts:
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.
`(30) The term `large capacity ammunition feeding device'--
`(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but
`(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.'.
`(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.'.
(d) Identification Markings- Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: `A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.'.
FULL text at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.308" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;:
Linked to that by this article: http://www.acorn-online.com/joomla15/wi ... zines.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Well, a ban on possession is confiscation so I guess they're going to have to buy a bunch of magazines.