Pro gun White-house!

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

hirundo82
Senior Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Pro gun White-house!

Post by hirundo82 »

G26ster wrote:If this eliminates the new rule, SOMEBODY NEEDS TO TELL THE NRA! I just got this 5 minutes ago via email. It's dated TODAY. i think all the White House did is say they could not do it WITHOUT public review. Don't think that will stop them.

http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Feder ... px?id=6232" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm pretty sure they can't do it without enabling legislation. The handgun reporting requirements are a '68 Gun Control Act thing.

Doesn't mean they won't try, but it will only give Congress more of a push to reign in the rulemaking powers of the executive agencies.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Barack Obama, 12/20/2007
User avatar
G26ster
Senior Member
Posts: 2655
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:28 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Pro gun White-house!

Post by G26ster »

hirundo82 wrote:
G26ster wrote:If this eliminates the new rule, SOMEBODY NEEDS TO TELL THE NRA! I just got this 5 minutes ago via email. It's dated TODAY. i think all the White House did is say they could not do it WITHOUT public review. Don't think that will stop them.

http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Feder ... px?id=6232" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm pretty sure they can't do it without enabling legislation. The handgun reporting requirements are a '68 Gun Control Act thing.

Doesn't mean they won't try, but it will only give Congress more of a push to reign in the rulemaking powers of the executive agencies.
Then why isn't the NRA asking to contact our legislators instead of the DOJ? Also, This is for semi-auto long guns, not handguns. I believe they have the power to do this without congress. All the White House said was that it wasn't an "emergency" and public comment was required. Just like with the FAA, with whom I dealt for years, when they propose a new rule, they put out an NPRM (Notice of Proposed Rule Making) and then make the final rule after the comment period. I could be wrong, but if it required congressional approval, the NRA, as they usually do, would be asking us to contact our legislators not the DOJ.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”