from Walmart's side, if they are bent on keeping that policy, I can see why they dismissed people for violating company policy (if you let violators stay on, that can set a tricky precedent). However, I believe their explanation is only a half-truth: "the actions taken put their safety - and potentially the safety of our customers and other associates - in jeopardy." If this weren't such a litigious society, I don't think those guys would be job-hunting. It was the THIEF, not the employees, who took actions that endangered the staff and customers - the actions of those staff members *eliminated* that danger. Gotta wonder how many of us are employed by a company where it is against policy to 'lay down your life for your friends.'
4 Walmart employees fired after disarming gunman caught shoplifting
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=14319284
LAYTON, UT -- The shoplifter smashed Gabriel Stewart up against a wall. It didn't take him long to realize that pressure against his lower back was from a loaded gun held by a desperate man who didn't want to go to jail.
The gunman had a firm grip on Stewart's shoulder, telling him and three of his Walmart co-workers, "Don't make me do this."
"Absolutely, time stopped," Stewart told KSL News. "I didn't know what to do."
Instantly, Shawn Ray and Justin Richins kicked into gear, spinning the gunman around. Lori Poulsen ripped the gun away and secured it. They all held onto the man until police arrived minutes later.
The four Layton Walmart employees felt it was mission accomplished. Police officers told them they had done everything right.
But a week later, all four were fired from their jobs. Walmart said their actions had violated company policy and put their fellow workers and shoppers at risk.