LSUTiger wrote:I think what the instructor may have meant was that as a CHL it may be more likely that you would be asked for help in an emergency than a non CHL, not that as a CHL you are obligated any more than anyone else.
I'm not arguing about what the instructor may have said, but the police currently have no way of knowing who has a CHL.
Also, a person who is qualified to get a CHL could be deaf, blind in one eye, have emphysema and rheumatoid arthritis, and generally find it difficult to assist in a physically demanding situation. It would not make practical sense to place such a requirement on CHL holders.
Furthermore, when the balloon goes up, I would much rather have a shotgun or carbine. Probably far more people own and can use a long gun than have a CHL.
- Jim