Carrying and drinking clarified?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by baldeagle »

Kythas wrote:I just found the following statement on the Texas DPS Concealed Handgun FAQ under the question "Can I carry a handgun when I am drinking?". Note the last line:
According to the Texas Penal Code, it is unlawful for an individual who is intoxicated to carry a handgun. It is important to note that the Penal Code defines “intoxicated” as not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance in the body. Additionally, the Penal Code considers having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or higher to constitute intoxication.
To me, this means the DPS requires you to pass the same .08 BAC as everyone else to determine if you're too intoxicated to be carrying your weapon, and the argument that it's up to the discretion of the officer on the scene and there's no BAC standard is incorrect. Is my thought process here wrong?

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/administra ... hlfaqs.htm
Nope. You're misreading the FAQ. It's an either or not an and. If it were an and, the "loss of the normal use" part would be irrelevant. As I've explained elsewhere, the "loss of the normal use" clause is a judgment call both for the officer and for the jury. If you want to roll those dice, by all means do so.

BTW, even without a gun you don't have to blow .08 BAC to be convicted. I know this because I was a foreman on a jury that convicted a woman of DUI without ever having had introduced into evidence a BAC test. But I already told you that in the other thread. So, as someone else has already said ..... :deadhorse: :deadhorse:
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
firefighter3217
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:30 pm
Location: DFW and Stephenville

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by firefighter3217 »

Crossfire wrote: Kinda.... except you don't usually thow up on your shoes when you are sleep deprived.
speking of sleep deprivation, from what I understand, you can also get a DUI for driving with a severe lack of sleep... a cop told me that once in Washington, so I'm not sure if it's true here, but think about it... A person who hasn't slept in 48 hours makes about as many bad calls driving as does someone who's had too much to drink...

Any LEOs want to validate that or bustthe myth? I'm not saying that I make a habit of driving while falling asleep, as it scares the living snot out of me, but just for learning's sake I'd like to know...
about 65 days to plastic...
Carry guns:
Springfield V-10 3.5" 1911(thanks again, Texasvet)
Glock 26
Springfield XD40 4"
Llama 1911 (hey, don't knock it. Never had a SINGLE reliability problem with it. Over 1000 rounds through it.)
(lots of long guns, and a few other pistols for other use)
User avatar
MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by MasterOfNone »

firefighter3217 wrote:
Crossfire wrote: Kinda.... except you don't usually thow up on your shoes when you are sleep deprived.
speking of sleep deprivation, from what I understand, you can also get a DUI for driving with a severe lack of sleep... a cop told me that once in Washington, so I'm not sure if it's true here, but think about it... A person who hasn't slept in 48 hours makes about as many bad calls driving as does someone who's had too much to drink...

Any LEOs want to validate that or bustthe myth? I'm not saying that I make a habit of driving while falling asleep, as it scares the living snot out of me, but just for learning's sake I'd like to know...
The thing is, no matter how tired you are, when the cop lights you up, you become wide awake. So the odds of demonstrating impair faculties once you're stopped gets slim.
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter
User avatar
Divided Attention
Senior Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:03 pm

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by Divided Attention »

Kudos to you Mr. ViperBoa :tiphat:
Blessed be the LORD, my rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle; Psalm 144:1-2
CHL - 2010; NRA RSO - 2011, NRA Chief RSO - 2014
NRA Pistol Instructor -2013, NRA Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor - 2015
Lifetime NRA Member - 2013
AJ80
Senior Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by AJ80 »

MasterOfNone wrote:
firefighter3217 wrote:
Crossfire wrote: Kinda.... except you don't usually thow up on your shoes when you are sleep deprived.
speking of sleep deprivation, from what I understand, you can also get a DUI for driving with a severe lack of sleep... a cop told me that once in Washington, so I'm not sure if it's true here, but think about it... A person who hasn't slept in 48 hours makes about as many bad calls driving as does someone who's had too much to drink...

Any LEOs want to validate that or bustthe myth? I'm not saying that I make a habit of driving while falling asleep, as it scares the living snot out of me, but just for learning's sake I'd like to know...
The thing is, no matter how tired you are, when the cop lights you up, you become wide awake. So the odds of demonstrating impair faculties once you're stopped gets slim.
Yes, adrenaline has a way of doing that.
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by Keith B »

MasterOfNone wrote:
firefighter3217 wrote:
Crossfire wrote: Kinda.... except you don't usually thow up on your shoes when you are sleep deprived.
speking of sleep deprivation, from what I understand, you can also get a DUI for driving with a severe lack of sleep... a cop told me that once in Washington, so I'm not sure if it's true here, but think about it... A person who hasn't slept in 48 hours makes about as many bad calls driving as does someone who's had too much to drink...

Any LEOs want to validate that or bustthe myth? I'm not saying that I make a habit of driving while falling asleep, as it scares the living snot out of me, but just for learning's sake I'd like to know...
The thing is, no matter how tired you are, when the cop lights you up, you become wide awake. So the odds of demonstrating impair faculties once you're stopped gets slim.
The part about your adrenaline kicking in when the lights come on is accurate. However, in combination with other things, fatigue can enhance the effects of alcohol or drugs and make you a VERY dangerous driver. So, while you may wake up and be coherent when the LEO lights you up, prior to that you could be doing a lot of bobbing and weaving. This would tend to attract the LEO's attention and if you smell like alcohol, and are partially impaired and are marginal on the field sobriety test, the LEO may decide to detain you on probable cause and take you in for a BAC or charge you if they feel there are other substances that are contributing to the impairment.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
srothstein
Senior Member
Posts: 5322
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by srothstein »

firefighter3217 wrote:speking of sleep deprivation, from what I understand, you can also get a DUI for driving with a severe lack of sleep... a cop told me that once in Washington, so I'm not sure if it's true here, but think about it... A person who hasn't slept in 48 hours makes about as many bad calls driving as does someone who's had too much to drink...

Any LEOs want to validate that or bustthe myth? I'm not saying that I make a habit of driving while falling asleep, as it scares the living snot out of me, but just for learning's sake I'd like to know...
I have no idea about the Washington laws but I can bust the myth for Texas. Sort of. The Penal Code says:
Sec. 49.04. DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED. (a) A person commits an offense if the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place.
So, you must be intoxicated to be arrested for DWI in Texas. And intoxicated is specifically defined as:
(2) "Intoxicated" means:
(A) not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance into the body; or
(B) having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more.
For this discussion, the important part of the definition is the part about introduction of a substance into the body. So, you cannot be arrested for DWI for driving while fatigued in Texas.

But, since I agree with everyone else so far that this really is a dangerous act, I will point out that you can be arrested under the Transportation Code where it says:
Sec. 545.401. RECKLESS DRIVING; OFFENSE. (a) A person commits an offense if the person drives a vehicle in wilful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.
(b) An offense under this section is a misdemeanor punishable by:
(1) a fine not to exceed $200;
(2) confinement in county jail for not more than 30 days; or
(3) both the fine and the confinement.
I think it would be relatively easy to show the disregard for others safety based on what made the officer stop you in the first place. And I wanted to point out that this is a class B misdemeanor, just like a first offense DWI is. So, it can cost you jail time and you CHL. And that is without even mentioning how dangerous it is to your own life. Falling asleep while driving kills a lot of people each year.
Steve Rothstein
User avatar
Fangs
Senior Member
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: San Marcos, TX

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by Fangs »

I stick to one drink max if I'm carrying. If I'm going into a situation where I'm DD for a group of friends, but know that we'll be spending a few hours at 51% locations, I'll leave the gun at home and stick to one drink an hour. Though I know that one drink an hour keeps me way under the limit, I also don't want the hassle of smelling like alcohol with a weapon on my person if I get pulled over while driving home.

If I'm not DD, then I'm definitely leaving the boom stick at home. :cheers2:
"When I was a kid, people who did wrong were punished, restricted, and forbidden. Now, when someone does wrong, all of the rest of us are punished, restricted, and forbidden. The one who did the wrong is counselled and "understood" and fed ice cream." - speedsix
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by WildBill »

Fangs wrote:I stick to one drink max if I'm carrying. If I'm going into a situation where I'm DD for a group of friends, but know that we'll be spending a few hours at 51% locations, I'll leave the gun at home and stick to one drink an hour. Though I know that one drink an hour keeps me way under the limit, I also don't want the hassle of smelling like alcohol with a weapon on my person if I get pulled over while driving home.

If I'm not DD, then I'm definitely leaving the boom stick at home. :cheers2:
I always thought that a DD didn't drink at all.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar
Cobra Medic
Senior Member
Posts: 415
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:53 pm

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by Cobra Medic »

When someone posts to a thread AFTER posting the dead horse, it seems like they're admitting by their subsequent posting that it's not a dead horse situation. The logical conclusion is they posted the dead horse ONLY to stifle people who disagree. (Probably because they had no FACTS with which to REFUTE the people who disagree.)

Interesting.
:leaving
This will only hurt a little. What comes next, more so.
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by WildBill »

Cobra Medic wrote:When someone posts to a thread AFTER posting the dead horse, it seems like they're admitting by their subsequent posting that it's not a dead horse situation. The logical conclusion is they posted the dead horse ONLY to stifle people who disagree. (Probably because they had no FACTS with which to REFUTE the people who disagree.)

Interesting.
:leaving
You talking to me? :cool:
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by gigag04 »

:yawn
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar
tacticool
Senior Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by tacticool »

gigag04 wrote: :yawn
That's what happens when you :cheers2: too much.
When in doubt
Vote them out!
steveincowtown
Banned
Posts: 1374
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by steveincowtown »

mreavis wrote: So if you passed the test and were under .08 you might be ok, and I think it would depend on the LEO.
I wouldn't recommend it.

EVERYTHING (except the conviction) depends on the LEO. LEO are people, and what they think is acceptable or not will vary greatly. (Warning: Stereotypes coming...) If you run into a small town LEO (who's Grandpa use to have a still, and he himself prefers Bud over Bud Light) his interpretation of intoxicated is surely going to be different then a State Trooper at the Capital in Austin. That being said…IMHO you have nothing to gain by submitting to any form of test, unless it was ordered by a Judge; in this case you don’t have a lot to gain, but you sure do have a lot to lose.
The Time is Now...
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
Fangs
Senior Member
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: San Marcos, TX

Re: Carrying and drinking clarified?

Post by Fangs »

WildBill wrote:
Fangs wrote:I stick to one drink max if I'm carrying. If I'm going into a situation where I'm DD for a group of friends, but know that we'll be spending a few hours at 51% locations, I'll leave the gun at home and stick to one drink an hour. Though I know that one drink an hour keeps me way under the limit, I also don't want the hassle of smelling like alcohol with a weapon on my person if I get pulled over while driving home.

If I'm not DD, then I'm definitely leaving the boom stick at home. :cheers2:
I always thought that a DD didn't drink at all.
Hehe, around here it means the most sober person. :evil2:
"When I was a kid, people who did wrong were punished, restricted, and forbidden. Now, when someone does wrong, all of the rest of us are punished, restricted, and forbidden. The one who did the wrong is counselled and "understood" and fed ice cream." - speedsix
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”