Carrying at work?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
Kirk
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 pm
Location: Katy, Texas

Carrying at work?

Post by Kirk »

So I reading though our employee handbook and find this statement-

Employees may be subject to discipline, up to and including termination, for violation of COMPANY policy…
Additionally, depending upon the severity of the misconduct, employees may be subject to discipline, up to and including termination, for reasons that include, but are not limited to

Possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon while on Company business or Company property, unless permitted by applicable state or local law



So my question is does my CHL make it “permitted by applicable state or local law”? I’m reading as yes but I just got my CHL so with the knowledgeable folks here I thought I would see how others read it.
KE5HLZ
NRA Life Member

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Kythas
Senior Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:06 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by Kythas »

That's how I would read it. You may want to get clarification from your HR department, though.
“I’m all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let’s start with typewriters.” - Frank Lloyd Wright

"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms" - Aristotle
User avatar
RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts: 5071
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by RPBrown »

A I read that, I would say yes but IANAL.
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by gigag04 »

Ummm...I woulnt say a thing to HR or anyone else. Seems like you are covered but why risk getting effective notice.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar
G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts: 2987
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by G.A. Heath »

gigag04 wrote:Ummm...I woulnt say a thing to HR or anyone else. Seems like you are covered but why risk getting effective notice.
+1 :iagree:
How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019
User avatar
Slowplay
Senior Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:52 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by Slowplay »

The policy of my employer does not have such a qualification (just a blanket weapons prohibition). I wish our HR/Legal folks were on the same page as your HR/Legal folks.
NRA Benefactor Member
"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance..."
- John Philpot Curran
hirundo82
Senior Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by hirundo82 »

I don't think that is saying it is OK to carry if you have a CHL. Language like that has been popping up in HR manuals over the past few years as states pass laws requiring employers to allow employees to store firearms in their vehicles.

That said, it's not valid §30.06 notice so the worst that can happen if you are caught is you are fired. Getting HR to clarify is just asking to be given oral notice that no firearms are allowed on the property, which would be legally binding to a CHL holder (arguably even in your vehicle).
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Barack Obama, 12/20/2007
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by WildBill »

G.A. Heath wrote:
gigag04 wrote:Ummm...I woulnt say a thing to HR or anyone else. Seems like you are covered but why risk getting effective notice.
+1 :iagree:
+1 :iagree:
"It's always easier for a bureaucrat to say "No" than "Yes" - Wild Bill
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar
Texas_Tactical
Senior Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:15 pm
Location: Longview/Tyler, Texas
Contact:

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by Texas_Tactical »

Kirk wrote:So I reading though our employee handbook and find this statement-

Employees may be subject to discipline, up to and including termination, for violation of COMPANY policy…
Additionally, depending upon the severity of the misconduct, employees may be subject to discipline, up to and including termination, for reasons that include, but are not limited to

Possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon while on Company business or Company property, unless permitted by applicable state or local law



So my question is does my CHL make it “permitted by applicable state or local law”? I’m reading as yes but I just got my CHL so with the knowledgeable folks here I thought I would see how others read it.
One could make the argument that this policy doesn't allow carrying under GC §411.203. Because your company policy states that Possession of a firearm is subject to discipline up to termination. However your company policy makes an exception "unless permitted by applicable state or local law" and CCW is permitted by state law unless posted w/30.06 or given effective notice by employer. This is just one argument that could be made, your employer could have a different view of this.

Obviously this is at your own risk. If you decide to carry I would be absolutely sure it was concealed and if any questions arise state this policy. In this situation it's a hope for the best attitude. I tried not to twist anything around for my own meaning, If I have feel free to correct.
Image
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by sjfcontrol »

WildBill wrote:
G.A. Heath wrote:
gigag04 wrote:Ummm...I woulnt say a thing to HR or anyone else. Seems like you are covered but why risk getting effective notice.
+1 :iagree:
+1 :iagree:
"It's always easier for a bureaucrat to say "No" than "Yes" - Wild Bill
It's also easier to ask for forgiveness than permission! :biggrinjester:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
Ameer
Senior Member
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by Ameer »

If they want to fire you, they will find a reason, or give none at all.
I believe the basic political division in this country is not between liberals and conservatives but between those who believe that they should have a say in the personal lives of strangers and those who do not.
jordanmills
Banned
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:42 am

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by jordanmills »

gigag04 wrote:Ummm...I woulnt say a thing to HR or anyone else. Seems like you are covered but why risk getting effective notice.
Yep. And if you keep it concealed, they should never know any way. So you're not breaking the law OR company policy. Carry on.
User avatar
2up1down
Member
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:47 pm

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by 2up1down »

gigag04 wrote:Ummm...I woulnt say a thing to HR or anyone else.
Seems like you are covered but why risk getting effective notice..
:iagree:

I would read it as written, "Possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon while on Company business or Company property, unless permitted by applicable state or local law" and be thankful that I have a dated copy of this
policy and a Valid CHL should any questions ever arise.

Working in an "AT WILL" State, they can fire us for no reason at all,
so I would make sure I could defend myself and be alive to find another job if necessary.

If my company's policy contained a statement to that effect,
then this post of mine: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=43111" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
would not have been required. (might want to read it good Sir.)

and Read viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42941" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; for a cautionary story. (Thanks to Ameer for pointing me there)

Welcome to the board and don't be shy, asking questions before we make mistakes is the key to success
considering our responsibility to ourselves, families, the public and law.

There will always be differing opinions, but it is each of our responsibilities to make our own decision,
considering the consequences may be our death, imprisonment or loss of a Loved One.

Again Welcome, you will find many of these great Citizens have amazing insight that they will share.

Good luck,
Michael
Become a Student of the Law we live under and proficient in the protection of yourself: so you may protect your Family, State and way of Live. Awareness is your first defense, avoidance your first tactic. If engagement is forced, Stop when the threat is gone.
User avatar
Kirk
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 pm
Location: Katy, Texas

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by Kirk »

2up1down,

Thanks. I am following both the threads you have linked. I have found many knowledgeable post on the forum and posted this just to see if I was on the right track. The area I work at is not the garden spot of Houston and our night crew is not allow to leave the facility during their shift due to a contractor being robbed at gun point close by.

Since the Employee manual also state my just is "At Will" they can still terminate me. Yea, I could go to court and fight it but I believe its going to come down to my safety first after I leaves the gates of the plant.

As stated in other post "Concealed mean Concealed"

Again thank you for your feedback!! :thumbs2:
KE5HLZ
NRA Life Member

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
Thomas Jefferson
boba

Re: Carrying at work?

Post by boba »

Kirk wrote:Since the Employee manual also state my just is "At Will" they can still terminate me. Yea, I could go to court and fight it but I believe its going to come down to my safety first after I leaves the gates of the plant.
It's not a reason prohibited by law so going to court might not help any.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”