Pro sporting event carry

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
solitaryshell
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 1:35 pm

Pro sporting event carry

Post by solitaryshell »

My daughter has volleyball practice (a pay group, not school sponsored in any way) at a facility that also has a large hockey rink in the same building. At this place every so often they have a minor league hockey team play at the same time as our practice, but if you mention it to the staff for parking that you are NOT there for the hockey game, you are there for volleyball, then they let you pass without paying. The doors do NOT have any kind of .30-06 signage anywhere, and this facility is privately owned, not part of any school property. When a game is not going on, I've carried with no concern as there is no pro sporting event going on, but when they have a hockey game going on at the same time, does that make the entire building off limits? The rink is separate, the only area where I'm in proximity of their crowd is in the hallways out, and the bathrooms, so I've took it as though I'm not at a "pro sporting event" because I don't go where they are, ie, I'm not sitting in the crowd. What do you guys think? :headscratch
User avatar
Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by Beiruty »

Grey area. Better be on the right side of the law.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
User avatar
Kythas
Senior Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:06 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by Kythas »

I would say if you didn't purchase a ticket to the hockey game, and are not sitting in the area where the hockey game is being played, then you are not attending a professional sporting event.

However, I am not a lawyer, I do not play one on TV, and I did not stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
“I’m all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let’s start with typewriters.” - Frank Lloyd Wright

"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms" - Aristotle
User avatar
MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by MasterOfNone »

You could try to apply the "portion of a building" part of the definition of "premises," but I think you'd have to concede that the hallways, restrooms, and other areas used by attendees of the hockey game are part of that portion. And you indicated that you use those same areas, so I would not want to carry there.
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter
hirundo82
Senior Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by hirundo82 »

Agreed that it's a gray area. You're probably OK under the "or portion of a building" part of the definition of premises in §46.035 but I wouldn't risk it personally.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Barack Obama, 12/20/2007
srothstein
Senior Member
Posts: 5323
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by srothstein »

It is a very gray area. The law says you cannot go into the premises where the event is taking place. It defines premises as a building or portion of a building. But, it never says which is meant or who decides if it is the whole building or just the portion.

I think the intent of the law was to only bar the actual part used for the event so that you could carry in your area, just for cases like this. But I cannot say for sure that this is even true. It is just how I read that clause allowing it, to provide for the smaller part if there is a multi-use building.

But, to confuse you even further, I would recommend not carrying while there is a practice going on. Note that the law says "event" and not competition, game, or anything like that. I can see a strong argument that practice is a sporting event. It would depend on the owner, the police, the DA, and the judge and jury of course, but you should be aware of this possibility. The definition of event is just as gray as the definition of professional or sporting.

These are some of the reasons I really like the idea of making all of the places that are listed in that section to post like churches and amusement parks are now required to.
Steve Rothstein
User avatar
MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by MasterOfNone »

srothstein wrote:I think the intent of the law was to only bar the actual part used for the event so that you could carry in your area, just for cases like this. But I cannot say for sure that this is even true. It is just how I read that clause allowing it, to provide for the smaller part if there is a multi-use building.
This is how I interpret it as well, because otherwise there is absolutely no meaning to including "or portion of a building" in the law.
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter
stash
Senior Member
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:04 am
Location: Woodcreek

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by stash »

Don't mean to hijack, but someday it sure would be nice to see these gray areas turned to black and white.
TSRA
NRA
TFC
USMC 1961-1966
User avatar
Jasonw560
Senior Member
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: Harlingen, TX

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by Jasonw560 »

stash wrote:Don't mean to hijack, but someday it sure would be nice to see these gray areas turned to black and white.
:iagree: Wish someone would have cleared that up this session. And made it legal for CHL'ers to carry on K-12 campuses. Oh, well, there's always 2013, after people see that concealed carry on college campuses isn't turning them into wild west shows.
NRA EPL pending life member

"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government"- Patrick Henry
hirundo82
Senior Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Pro sporting event carry

Post by hirundo82 »

stash wrote:Don't mean to hijack, but someday it sure would be nice to see these gray areas turned to black and white.
Best way to do that would be to do away with the off limits areas altogether.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Barack Obama, 12/20/2007
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”