Hammer or Hammerless?
Moderator: carlson1
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
...NICE job!!!
- Dusty Harry
- Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:31 pm
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
Nice Bob Job. I've never missed the exposed hammer on my Centennial. I would much prefer a smoothed over DA pull vs. cocked revolver for defensive work - it doesn't take much excitement to generate potential for an AD...
Professional Training, Competition, Risk Avoidance, Situational Awareness, Tactical Mindset, 100,000+ rounds down range - the hardware is the least important part of the equation...
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
...for a stiff trigger on a gun I didn't want to pay to have smoothed...Gun Butter has made a lot of difference for me...I remove the sideplate and apply it sparingly at all contact surfaces...noticeable difference...only had to use it once...haven't a clue why it works well...
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
that most likely I would never have the time to cock the hammer if the situation came up. I like the fact that without the hammer it is one less thing that could snag clothing

TX CHL 1997
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
One of our posters kindly gave me instructions on ordering replacement springs and do-it-yourself steps for my S&W 442. Replaced the trigger spring. Helped quite a bit.speedsix wrote:...for a stiff trigger on a gun I didn't want to pay to have smoothed.....
TX CHL 1997
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1919
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
- Location: NE TX
Re: Hammer or Hammerless?
personal preference, I want the hammer. For a carefully aimed shot, I want all the advantages available, and dropping the trigger pull 2-3 pounds has helped me make those tight snake shots I may have missed otherwise.
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!