For contact info on each go here:
http://www.senate.state.tx.us/75r/Senat ... 0/c590.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Below is what I just sent
I heard how ultra-safe UT Austin is, the UT crime map shows in the past year, 3/23/2010-3/23-2011
153 assaults, and 186 burglaries (and currently CHLs must store guns in cars for vehicular burglars to get)
How do they call that safe?
http://www.ucrime.com/tx/university+of+texas+at+austin" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I have a logic question.
Those more likely to commit crimes deciding whether those less likely to commit crimes may protect themselves.
DPS Statistics prove that CHLs are far less likely to commit crimes.
That is as illogical as having prisoners vote on whether prison guards may be armed for self protection.
Why trust people who think it's cute or smart to waive cardboard guns around at Senate hearings to decide whether an adult female may protect herself from a parking lot rapist?
The anti- group kept throwing out the red herring to try and divert the topic to campus safety, this bill is about personal protection, not CHLs acting as campus security.
Please pass this bill without amendments.
Thank you.
