L1 photos are for biometric identification.

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
HotLeadSolutions
Senior Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Rowlett, TX

L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by HotLeadSolutions »

I was speaking with an L-1 employee today, and she told me that they don't like it when you smile in your L-1 pic, because it changes the structure of your face and the computers can't reconize you as well. When I inquired "What computers?" she told me the ones that all of the police depts use for facial recognition.

Was anyone else aware that our photos were being stored in an image bank for these purposes? :shock:
Daniel
CHL Instructor
Dallas Concealed Carry
http://www.DallasConcealedCarry.com
User avatar
McKnife
Senior Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Houston

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by McKnife »

I DO NOT KNOW FOR SURE:

I don't think police in the USA are doing this. However, I've heard that it's common practice in the US Casinos and overseas like UK. :leaving

I've heard that the distance between your eyes is a better identifying feature than a fingerprint.
Last edited by McKnife on Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
:coolgleamA:
User avatar
sugar land dave
Senior Member
Posts: 1396
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by sugar land dave »

Yes, for a few years now. Aren't you happy that Britain became such a public camera crazy country and exported all that technology to us!
DPS Received Forms- 1/18/11 Online Status - 1/27/11 My Mailbox - 2/12/11
NRA Life Member
User avatar
HotLeadSolutions
Senior Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by HotLeadSolutions »

I know for a fact they are doing it in Florida, I was part of the debate to keep the cameras out of Tampa. (which we lost :???: )

I just didnt know images were being compiled from sources like L-1
Daniel
CHL Instructor
Dallas Concealed Carry
http://www.DallasConcealedCarry.com
User avatar
ELB
Senior Member
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by ELB »

HotLeadSolutions wrote:I was speaking with an L-1 employee today, and she told me that they don't like it when you smile in your L-1 pic, because it changes the structure of your face and the computers can't reconize you as well. When I inquired "What computers?" she told me the ones that all of the police depts use for facial recognition.

Was anyone else aware that our photos were being stored in an image bank for these purposes? :shock:

Interesting. Of course our photos are stored someplace -- remember we used to send in two physical photos, one for the license and one for filing, I'm sure. However, if they are also being used for routine searches by other agencies....hmmmm.

Also interesting about the smiling affecting facial recognition software performance. Would like to see some more evidence of it than just the one technician, but interesting as well. The CHL instructor I went to when I lived in San Antonio was a police officer who advised us to smile for both our CHLs and Driver's licenses. He said when cops are stopping people and checking IDs, they see a lot of scowling face; seeing a smiling face wouldn't buy us much, but would at least not be a negative point.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
¿Qué?

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by ¿Qué? »

That sounds like a good reason for a BIG smile in the L1 photo. :mrgreen:
BrianSW99
Senior Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:51 am

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by BrianSW99 »

Not saying they're not using CHL pictures for biometric purposes, but I'd wait for a statement from someone who knows what they're talking about before passing judgement. The people at the L1 offices don't seem to be the most "in the know" people, or even trustworthy for that matter.
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by WildBill »

HotLeadSolutions wrote:I was speaking with an L-1 employee today, and she told me that they don't like it when you smile in your L-1 pic, because it changes the structure of your face and the computers can't reconize you as well. When I inquired "What computers?" she told me the ones that all of the police depts use for facial recognition.
I don't buy this reason. Even before there was such a thing as biometrics, law enforcement agencied didn't want people to smile for their photos.
ELB wrote:The CHL instructor I went to when I lived in San Antonio was a police officer who advised us to smile for both our CHLs and Driver's licenses. He said when cops are stopping people and checking IDs, they see a lot of scowling face; seeing a smiling face wouldn't buy us much, but would at least not be a negative point.
To me, this is a more plausible explanation.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

The L-1 photos are so DPS can confirm that the person being fingerprinted is the person applying for a CHL. The photos are compared to Texas Driver's License photos. If the applicant doesn't have a Texas DL, the L-1 photo is compared to the photos sent in by the applicant.

Chas.
SWAMPRNR
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:20 pm
Location: Bruceville - Eddy Texas

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by SWAMPRNR »

I know before when i checked my background records on the Texas DPS web site there was never a picture of me in my records even tho i have a Texas DL. After having my prints and picture taken for a background check last year thru L1 guess what that picture now shows up on my background record check on the DPS website.So i guess they are using it for something
User avatar
KaiserB
Banned
Posts: 647
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: DFW Texas
Contact:

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by KaiserB »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:The L-1 photos are so DPS can confirm that the person being fingerprinted is the person applying for a CHL. The photos are compared to Texas Driver's License photos. If the applicant doesn't have a Texas DL, the L-1 photo is compared to the photos sent in by the applicant.

Chas.

Oh Charles why did you have to throw a wet blanket on all the conspiracies. I was going to post something about the scanners on the black helicopters that fly over DFW every day :)
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by Keith B »

KaiserB wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:The L-1 photos are so DPS can confirm that the person being fingerprinted is the person applying for a CHL. The photos are compared to Texas Driver's License photos. If the applicant doesn't have a Texas DL, the L-1 photo is compared to the photos sent in by the applicant.

Chas.

Oh Charles why did you have to throw a wet blanket on all the conspiracies. I was going to post something about the scanners on the black helicopters that fly over DFW every day :)
Charles just said what they did with them for CHL purposes, he never said they DIDN'T do biometric identification with them otherwise. :evil2: :lol:
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
HotLeadSolutions
Senior Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by HotLeadSolutions »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:The L-1 photos are so DPS can confirm that the person being fingerprinted is the person applying for a CHL. The photos are compared to Texas Driver's License photos. If the applicant doesn't have a Texas DL, the L-1 photo is compared to the photos sent in by the applicant.

Chas.
Chas,
You are right in this regard, but the photos do have another use. I spoke with another person (independent of employee #1) and he told me the same thing about being stored for biometric ID. It's not just CHL prints/photos it is also state employees, doctors, attorneys..etc..
Daniel
CHL Instructor
Dallas Concealed Carry
http://www.DallasConcealedCarry.com
User avatar
KaiserB
Banned
Posts: 647
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: DFW Texas
Contact:

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by KaiserB »

Keith B wrote:
KaiserB wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:The L-1 photos are so DPS can confirm that the person being fingerprinted is the person applying for a CHL. The photos are compared to Texas Driver's License photos. If the applicant doesn't have a Texas DL, the L-1 photo is compared to the photos sent in by the applicant.

Chas.

Oh Charles why did you have to throw a wet blanket on all the conspiracies. I was going to post something about the scanners on the black helicopters that fly over DFW every day :)
Charles just said what they did with them for CHL purposes, he never said they DIDN'T do biometric identification with them otherwise. :evil2: :lol:

In that case did you know that the US mil is using the new FLIR units to scan faces and compare them to the international database of citizens using Facial recognition software manufactured my Microsoft. We need to to do something!
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: L1 photos are for biometric identification.

Post by WildBill »

Here's a link to the website for L-1 Identity Solutions

They have several mobile units for fingerprints and photos.

http://www.l1id.com/pages/46-mobile-id- ... nforcement" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Endowment Member
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”