http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas ... 154786.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;






Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Anywhere else, it would be a diplomatic incident at best, and possibly an act of war...and for anyone who would say that the Mexican aircraft just "strayed" onto the US side, well they have little to no knowledge of flying...and besides, its kind of hard to miss seeing the RIVER...I hope and pray that next year, the despicable regime now occupying the White House will be packing their bags for the trip back to Chicagoland...mamabearCali wrote:GRRRR! You know if this was done to any other country anywhere else and it was not a joint mission there would be screaming and war threats. But because it is the US and the Washington Elite don't give a rats tail about our nations security when it comes to the borders this is just shrugged off.
Don't count out a terrorist using a Mexican aircraft for an attack.AEA wrote:As corrupt as the Mexican Govt. is, I'm betting they are dropping drugs inside US borders.
Thank you for the well thought out and informative reply... It seems very plausible but if this is the case then what would be the harm in our intelligence agency(ies) simply saying, "Hey this is a way to catch them off their game and it is a joint concerted effort to reduce the efficacy of the cartels ability to operate from Mexican border towns". It's not like after they used this tactic a few times it wasn't recognized... A helicopter with big ol' Federales on the side kinda gives it away. Plus I think just the thought of what may be construed as another blurring of the border with Mexico I can say causes my stomach to knot up just a little. Heck I wouldn't want my neighbor hanging out in my yard even if it was to sneak up and kill a mole without my knowledge or explicit permission.n5wd wrote:One of the reasons (not cited in the referenced article, but mentioned in another professional publication that I occasionally read) is that the Mexican side is so notoriously sprinkled with "spotters", people who are paid to report any state or federal judicial police ( the national police) or military movements to their cartel's intelligence network, that it's almost impossible for the Mexican government to launch a raid on the narcos without it being burned beforehand. Launching a raid from the US side of the border makes it less likely that the raid will be reported as they're getting together - much like our police usually gather several blocks, or even miles, away from a raid to gather everyone, final brief, and jump off towards the raid's location, making the raid more effective - something I'd think we, on this side of the Rio Grande, would appreciate.
And, for those of you who don't understand that the US military has done much the same thing, thousands of times- it may seem like something new. But, it's not. (Was personally involved in border incursions in Cambodia in 1970 - nah, we weren't there!) This time, it just happens to be our border that's being used, something that we in the United States aren't used to.
All the more reason not to do it to other countries' borders as nobody likes trespassers.n5wd wrote:And, for those of you who don't understand that the US military has done much the same thing, thousands of times- it may seem like something new. But, it's not. (Was personally involved in border incursions in Cambodia in 1970 - nah, we weren't there!) This time, it just happens to be our border that's being used, something that we in the United States aren't used to.
We'll get acclimated t it, just like we have with everything else. It is not like we can do anything about it and the government won't, so it shall continue.Medic624 wrote:Plus I think just the thought of what may be construed as another blurring of the border with Mexico I can say causes my stomach to knot up just a little.