bilgerat57 wrote:sjfcontrol wrote:Does anybody else see the irony in the statement...
"Like all federal employees, this individual is entitled to due process and protected by the Privacy Act.
"Protected by the Privacy Act"........I suppose the privacy act allows the world to be informed that there was a vibrator in her luggage? This TSA employee violated a public trust, but is protected by the privacy act? I can think of a number of police officers dismissed over the years for violation of the public trust who might find this statement interesting. Due process - Yes, definately. Privacy?

Well, to be fair (if there is such a thing), the agent did not inform the world of anything. S/he just put a note into the luggage.
But I did find it ironic that an agent who's job is to invade other people's privacy, and overstepped his/her bounds by writing a personal message, would then be protected by the privacy act.