old eyes

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
StewNTexas
Senior Member
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Ingleside, TX

Re: old eyes

Post by StewNTexas »

I was also suffering from 'tired eyes'. At dusk and beyond, it was difficult to read street signs. It got to the point that I tried to not drive after 6:00 PM unless really necessary.

At my last eye exam, just over six months ago, I was told that I had cataracts, and it was time to do something about it. They no longer do both eyes at the same time, usually wait 30 to 60 days between procedures. It was decided that my left eye would go first. Not sure how this is decided, but the surgeon made the decision. Being an old fart, paying onto social security for over 50 years, it did not cost me a great deal. Roughly about fifty bucks per eye.

My 'patch/protection' was removed the following day, and I could see. I mean really see. I had not seen this well without glasses/contacts since I was about 14 years old. This was a new world.

About 45 days later, the did the right eye. Same dollar amount, almost as good results. I have been shooting for over 60 years, right eye dominant. The right eye has a small bit of 'fuzzy' at over 30 feet, and drives me crazy. I sure wish the right was as good as the left.

I do not want to wear glasses again. It is unbelieveable how much more freedom you have with them. My biggest problem is getting over wearing glasses. Whenever I pull a shirt over my head, I automatically reach up to take my glasses off. I hope I get over this as time passes.

I have been trying to shoot using my left eye, and it is not working out too well. This is for pistols only of course. I am on my third defib/pacemaker device, and it is HIGHLY suggested that I not shoot any rifles over .22 due to recoil.

Fear and common sense made me take this advise very seriously. Long ago and far away I was a world class rifle shooter. Got a few chunks of 14k, and was invited to the olympic tryouts for the 1964 summer games. Being a young and cocky (and stupid) smart ass, I passed.
If the 2nd admendment only applies to muskets and muzzle-loaders, then the 1st admentment must apply only to the spoken or printed word. Printing must be done on hand presses, news stories must be written in longhand, no keyboards or electric processes may be used.
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: old eyes

Post by RPB »

I have presbyopia, Myopia, astigmatism and cataracts, (but not bad enough for operation yet)
I just got sights I could see. http://www.advantagetactical.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and explained to the eye doctor what I needed (took a small print song book to show the arm's length distances as book angled away for top line(front sight) /bottom line (rear sight)

Re: Eye sight and getting older
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=51349&p=625462&hil ... s+#p625462" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

search.php?keywords=%22Advantage+Tactical+Sights%22" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar
puma guy
Senior Member
Posts: 7945
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: old eyes

Post by puma guy »

RPB wrote:I have presbyopia, Myopia, astigmatism and cataracts, (but not bad enough for operation yet)
I just got sights I could see. http://www.advantagetactical.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and explained to the eye doctor what I needed (took a small print song book to show the arm's length distances as book angled away for top line(front sight) /bottom line (rear sight)

Re: Eye sight and getting older
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=51349&p=625462&hil ... s+#p625462" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

search.php?keywords=%22Advantage+Tactical+Sights%22" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I had all of the above and did have surgery to remove the cataracts and get inter-ocular implants. My opthamologist suggested multi-focus lenses and told me I would not have to wear glasses. I am still wearing glasses since I can't see with the wonderful lens he recommended plus at night I have what looks like 30 concentric rings of light emanating from every light source in my vision. At least it looks like a target :lol: The other option is usually one near and one far implant which I wish I had chosen. I informed him that I shoot and he assured me what I was getting for a great deal of extra expense would be just the ticket.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: old eyes

Post by AEA »

george wrote:Thanks, guys, but I guess I'll just keep lookin' for my panacea in another direction.

Bigger sights
I think you have made the right decision. :thumbs2:
My thought is to play the cards your are dealt. Putting your hope of outcome in someone's hands is a very risky choice (IMO). Make necessary adjustments that are OUTSIDE of your body (which are difficult/impossible to replace/repair).
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: old eyes

Post by RPB »

george wrote:Thanks, guys, but I guess I'll just keep lookin' for my panacea in another direction.

Bigger sights
Reviews from others who call them "old man sights" etc lol
http://www.advantagetactical.com/reviews.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thing about ATS Advantage Tactical Sights is:
They are easier to see
(not really much "bigger" if they are bigger at all)

They are multi-angled/sloped so they don't unintentionally snag

I guess what I mean is: hard to explain and my photos don't do much better, you have to see them in person but
they are sloped so they look "bigger" in that there is more top/angled surface area, though they aren't a lot "taller"
Image
Image
Image
Last edited by RPB on Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:19 am, edited 6 times in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: old eyes

Post by RPB »

My photography stinks, but I'm trying to sort of show the multi-angles - they look taller/bigger, but they aren't really
And it's not hard to "make a triangle"
http://www.advantagetactical.com/reviews.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
Image
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
mot7981
Senior Member
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:17 pm
Location: West Houston

Re: old eyes

Post by mot7981 »

Thanks for the heads up. I think this is a real option worth looking into for some of the older, errr, more senior & distinguished members of the forum like myself.
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”