Alf wrote:Wes wrote:further down there is a section that reads
"(i) Subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply
if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06."
That's the actual law but what happens when you have a cop that didn't read the law. It's like having one beer when carrying. It's not illegal if you're not intoxicated but you're gambling the cop knows the law. That's why I tell everyone not to carry in church. It's better to err on the side of caution.
I mean no offense to Alf whatsoever.
This is one example of an argument that I see on these boards all the time in relation to invalid gun buster signs, etc. The argument seems to be that we should make sure that we limit our actions so that we don't somehow do something that some misinformed LEO somewhere could possibly think is illegal. By extension, you probably shouldn't go to church at all. A LEO could possibly think that setting foot in a religious house of worship is illegal since it offends Atheists. Also, no driving, no walking down the street, etc. Best to just stay bunkered up in your house.
I'm sure there are some LEO's who are ignorant of various laws. However, I happen to believe that the vast majority of Texas LEO's are actually knowledgable of the laws that they are sworn to uphold. I am not going to give up attending church on the small possibility that I might be the "test case" for a law that is completely unambiguous. I might also be the "test case" that proves eating meat is not a crime. I'm not giving up BBQ either.
Can Alf or anyone else please tell me exactly how many cases we had in the past 1-2 years of a licensed CHL holder being arrested solely because they legally carried to church (no valid 30.06 posted, etc)? Have there even been any cases of this happening?