Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by Keith B »

This is a hoot, but unfortunately right on target.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=3h8O7V-WxWQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
old farmer
Senior Member
Posts: 601
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:00 am
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by old farmer »

:tiphat:

Unable to view site? Please post URL....
God Bliss America.
User avatar
74novaman
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: CenTex

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by 74novaman »

old farmer wrote::tiphat:

Unable to view site? Please post URL....
Whoever posted the video on youtube has embedding disabled, so you have to go watch on youtube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h8O7V-W ... r_embedded
TANSTAAFL
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by Keith B »

Sorry, didn't show that to me initially for some reason. :???: I fixed the original post.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by sjfcontrol »

That was GREAT! "rlol"
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by WildBill »

sjfcontrol wrote:That was GREAT! "rlol"
:iagree: Thanks for the post Keith.
I wonder why Jimmy didn't have anything to say? :headscratch
NRA Endowment Member
Toorop

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by Toorop »

I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment. He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so. He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.

Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Toorop wrote:I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment. He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so. He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.

Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
He also helped to kill all other rights. Thanks to that jackwagon, starting next year I get fined monthly, enforced by the IRS, for not having enough money to afford health insurance. He's a commie socialist, and Reagan, guns, or whatever, Obama IS the worst president we've ever had. Furthermore, HE only signed those things into law because they were attached to bills that he wanted worse. If he had been handed those things individually to sign off on, he'd have squashed them flat, and you KNOW that's true. So don't try to paint him as any better than Reagan on guns, because he's not. He's actually worse. At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border. The buck for that one stops with Obama.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
carlson1
Moderator
Posts: 11865
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by carlson1 »

:iagree:

Good Stuff Keith.
Image
User avatar
Kadelic
Senior Member
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Duncanville, TX

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by Kadelic »

The Annoyed Man wrote:At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border.
If I recollect, didn't Reagan sell weapons to Iran?
Honor Necessity
JP171
Banned
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by JP171 »

Kadelic wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border.
If I recollect, didn't Reagan sell weapons to Iran?
no that was one Col. Oliver North :lol: but selling weapons to a legal government is a bit different than selling thru illegal straw purchases to a drug gang
Toorop

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by Toorop »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Toorop wrote:I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment. He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so. He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.

Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
He also helped to kill all other rights. Thanks to that jackwagon, starting next year I get fined monthly, enforced by the IRS, for not having enough money to afford health insurance. He's a commie socialist, and Reagan, guns, or whatever, Obama IS the worst president we've ever had. Furthermore, HE only signed those things into law because they were attached to bills that he wanted worse. If he had been handed those things individually to sign off on, he'd have squashed them flat, and you KNOW that's true. So don't try to paint him as any better than Reagan on guns, because he's not. He's actually worse. At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border. The buck for that one stops with Obama.
You do know the gun walking started under Bush, right?

So why did Reagan ban machine guns? Why can't Californians exercise their right to carry?

You've made no logical point.
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by Keith B »

Toorop wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Toorop wrote:I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment. He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so. He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.

Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
He also helped to kill all other rights. Thanks to that jackwagon, starting next year I get fined monthly, enforced by the IRS, for not having enough money to afford health insurance. He's a commie socialist, and Reagan, guns, or whatever, Obama IS the worst president we've ever had. Furthermore, HE only signed those things into law because they were attached to bills that he wanted worse. If he had been handed those things individually to sign off on, he'd have squashed them flat, and you KNOW that's true. So don't try to paint him as any better than Reagan on guns, because he's not. He's actually worse. At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border. The buck for that one stops with Obama.
You do know the gun walking started under Bush, right?

So why did Reagan ban machine guns? Why can't Californians exercise their right to carry?

You've made no logical point.
Yeah, the logical point is Obama is a socialist liberal. That's the point.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
hi-power
Senior Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:43 am
Location: Grapevine, TX

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by hi-power »

:iagree: with Keith B.

I'm also not going to argue with someone who thinks "Wide Receiver" is the same as "Fast & Furious". Just a little bit of research will show the vast differences between these two failed operations.
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

Toorop wrote:I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment.
That's a lie, pure and simple. Even when he almost died from a gunshot wound, he refused to support numerous gun control measures your Party tried to promote. Lying liberal Democrats did what they always do; they tried to engage in political profiteering by dancing in someone's blood.
Toorop wrote:He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so.
Cite them sport. And be sure to include proof that he "gladly did so."
Toorop wrote:He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.
Really? Since you weren't even alive then, how do you know? You don't have a clue what went into the negotiations on the Brady Bill. He very reluctantly supported the watered down version only out of respect for his then-friend James Brady who had been gravely wounded in the attempt on his life. He didn't "happily and loudly" endorse the Brady Bill. You don't seem to be the least bit constrained by the truth.
Toorop wrote:Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
That's false; Obama didn't sign a "National parks Law." He signed a credit card bill that he touted like an avenging angel. We added the National Parks language to the credit card bill and his attempt to have it stripped out failed. He was livid at having to sign his credit card bill with the National Parks language in it. He considered vetoing the bill but was warned it likely wouldn't pass again and certainly not without the National Parks language.

I recently participated in a radio debate with a lying liberal Democrat Houston attorney who made the exact false claim you just made and when I stated the facts I just related, he had no response. Claiming Obama willingly "expanded gun rights" is complete garbage and any attempt to convince people tells a great deal about the intellectual honesty of the person making such claims.

Chas.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”