Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Fox news is not that different from the others - just enough so that they can call themselves conservative. It all boils down to selling advertising time.Oldgringo wrote:Where is FOX News? I'm old enough to remember Watergate and the media's feeding frenzy over that coverup. Where are the reporters and the TV cameras?
...only because the other two branches are allowing themselves to be ran over....speedsix wrote:...they taught us in high school that the Judicial, Legislative, and Executive branches of the gov't were each to act as checks and balances on the others...seems like here the Executive branch is running roughshod over the people by controlling the other two branches...
Oh, it's transparent alright. I can see right through them. Obama is more concerned about covering for this than seeking justice. I have noticed its usually the criminals who want to cover their tracks, not the innocents.SlickTX wrote:This post must be a ruse. I thought this administration advertises itself as the most transparent ever?
TexasGal wrote:Oh, it's transparent alright. I can see right through them. Obama is more concerned about covering for this than seeking justice. I have noticed its usually the criminals who want to cover their tracks, not the innocents.SlickTX wrote:This post must be a ruse. I thought this administration advertises itself as the most transparent ever?
The Department of Justice is using the liberal “watchdog” group Media Matters for America to deflect questions about the Fast and Furious scandal, including those regarding a gun that might have been used in the murder of a U.S. Border Patrol agent.
But the end game is in the election. The side issues are increasing ...guns in Mexico, the Secret sercives in south America ..Walmart in Mex.. Ford new plant in China.. Greece and the euro..They are feeding the media. The media and the Internet are hunger wolfs. If you do not feed the wolfs, they will eat you.atticus wrote:If there was a time for "hysterical reaction" to Obama in the Alinsky analysis, it would have been when he ran for the Illinois state senate. That state senate seat gave him all the street cred he might have needed. After that, he schemed and won the Illinois senate seat, and spoke at the democrat national convention. What damage he has done as POTUS is happening long, long after the time for hysterical reaction. The damage is real, the danger is real. Yelling "fire" when fire is indeed destroying the state is not just a hysterical reaction. It's a call to the bucket brigade. To sit silently by as Obama continues to exert tyrannical destruction is not an option to folks like me.
It would be nice if the Republicans would nominate a Woodsman who can defeat the wolf but instead they seem committed to giving the wolf fresh meat.old farmer wrote:But the end game is in the election. The side issues are increasing ...guns in Mexico, the Secret sercives in south America ..Walmart in Mex.. Ford new plant in China.. Greece and the euro..They are feeding the media. The media and the Internet are hunger wolfs. If you do not feed the wolfs, they will eat you.atticus wrote:If there was a time for "hysterical reaction" to Obama in the Alinsky analysis, it would have been when he ran for the Illinois state senate. That state senate seat gave him all the street cred he might have needed. After that, he schemed and won the Illinois senate seat, and spoke at the democrat national convention. What damage he has done as POTUS is happening long, long after the time for hysterical reaction. The damage is real, the danger is real. Yelling "fire" when fire is indeed destroying the state is not just a hysterical reaction. It's a call to the bucket brigade. To sit silently by as Obama continues to exert tyrannical destruction is not an option to folks like me.
