


http://www.chronicleonline.com/content/ ... e-gun-case" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Jumping Frog wrote:One example why the concept of a jury of my "peers" is a very frightening idea.
It seems some of the readers believe the NAA is a .44 MAGNUM that could blow your leg clean off.A loaded Magnum Revolver, not just any handgun but an extremely powerful one -
Only in a sane world, my friend.Llorente argued Kane’s sold all manner of goods, everything from axes and lawnmowers to machetes and weed cutters, but it was understood that the purchaser carried the responsibility to learn the proper safe handling of those products.
I've always said juries are comprised of12 people who aren't smart enough to figure out how to get out of jury duty.Jumping Frog wrote:One example why the concept of a jury of my "peers" is a very frightening idea.
Correction..... A jury of your peers is probably highly desirable. A jury of the alleged victim's peers sounds like a bad idea.Jumping Frog wrote:One example why the concept of a jury of my "peers" is a very frightening idea.
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... (Jefferson quoting Beccaria)
... tyrants accomplish their purposes ...by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms. - Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, 1840