Reasonable First Amendment Restrictions

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
Shoot_First
Member
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:25 pm
Location: Texas

Reasonable First Amendment Restrictions

Post by Shoot_First »

Given the anti views on our 2nd Amendment rights, I wonder how they would view restrictions on their 1st Amendment....

/SATIRE FOLLOWS/ :biggrinjester:

Our First Amendment right to free speech permits communications for both good and for bad purposes. Due to the recent increases in the latter, reasonable restrictions to control abuse and prevent harm are necessary. Accordingly, those that distribute communications, such as newspapers, television networks and their stations, social media networks, and Internet web sites, etc., must apply to the Department of Homeland Security for a Federal Communications License (FCL).

Journalists, reporters, and all others who want to communicate through any communications media must complete a simple six page Communications Transaction Record (DHS Form 4473) at a FCL holder and answer a few simple questions prior to each communication:

1. Are you the actual communicator of the communication enclosed with this form?
2. Are you under indictment for a felony or have you ever been convicted of a felony?
3. Are you a fugitive from justice?
4. Are you an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance?
5. Have you ever been adjudicated mentally defective?
6. Are you subject to a court restraining order?
7. Have you under indictment or have you ever been convicted of domestic violence?
8. Have you ever renounced your United States citizenship?
9. Are you illegally in the United States?

The National Instant Communications Background Check System (NICS) will determine eligibility of the applicant to complete the communication.

/END SATIRE/ :biggrinjester:
Last edited by Shoot_First on Sun Jul 22, 2012 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
LSL
Member
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Reasonable First Amendment Restictions

Post by LSL »

More satire:

Are you Hispanic?

Sincere editorial comment: Whatever importance anyone's ethnic or religious origins possibly could make - for First or Second Amendment concerns!
Noli Voluntare Usque Vocaris / lsl
SA XDM 3.8c 9mm and Ruger LC9 -- each in a <tripleTholsters.com> IWB
Walther P22
User avatar
77346
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:49 pm
Location: Atascocita, TX

Re: Reasonable First Amendment Restictions

Post by 77346 »

LSL wrote:Whatever importance anyone's ethnic or religious origins possibly could make
of course they aren't profiling! ;-)
Alex
NRA Benefactor Life & TSRA Life Member
Bay Area Shooting Club Member
CHL since 7/12 | 28 days mailbox-to-mailbox
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13584
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Reasonable First Amendment Restrictions

Post by C-dub »

I had some related thoughts about this earlier this afternoon. What if there were penalties for spreading lies or incorrect information? I guess they couldn't really be held responsible for information they were given by the police that later turned out to be false, but rather other stuff that they make up on their own when talking out their wazoo to fill time.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”