What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Post by The Annoyed Man »

sjfcontrol wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:
barstoolguru wrote:to many "trigger words"... HLS is watching
assassination attack domestic security drill exercise cops law enforcement authorities idsaster assistance disaster management national preparedness mitigation prevention response recovery dirty bomb domestic nuclear detection emergency management emergency response first responder homeland security mda national preparedness initiative militia shooting shots fired evacuation deaths hostage explosion police dmat organized crime gangs national security state of emergency
Living dangerously, are we? :lol: Oh, and you forgot insurrection, revolution, bullet box, evangelical, diesel, and fertilizer. :mrgreen:
But, he added one, "idsaster"" :anamatedbanana
That's DHS code for "Jumping Frog." :mrgreen:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
Jasonw560
Senior Member
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: Harlingen, TX

Re: What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Post by Jasonw560 »

This evangelical just put out fertilizer on his yard while watching his twins exercise while I prevented a domestic wasp attack (so I didn't need to act as a First Responder)at my compound. :patriot:
NRA EPL pending life member

"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government"- Patrick Henry
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Post by anygunanywhere »

So much for the cold war being over.

Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Post by The Annoyed Man »

anygunanywhere wrote:So much for the cold war being over.

Anygunanywhere
Exactly. It was almost over, for a while there.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
longhorn_92
Senior Member
Posts: 1621
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Post by longhorn_92 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:So much for the cold war being over.

Anygunanywhere
Exactly. It was almost over, for a while there.
It has never been over. The communists just opened their borders and changed tactics. They have infiltrated the democratic party and called themselves "progressives".
“If you try to shoot me, I will have to shoot you back, and I promise you I won’t miss!”

NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Member
Heartland Patriot

Re: What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Post by Heartland Patriot »

longhorn_92 wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:So much for the cold war being over.

Anygunanywhere
Exactly. It was almost over, for a while there.
It has never been over. The communists just opened their borders and changed tactics. They have infiltrated the democratic party and called themselves "progressives".
They were working on that for a long, long time...go look up the wonderful Mr. Woodrow Wilson...the man churns my stomach. :mad:
AlphaWhiskey
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:57 pm
Location: Katy, TX

Re: What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Post by AlphaWhiskey »

The Annoyed Man wrote:The Russians wouldn't have done it with Clinton.
Well, true, they didn't try to set up permanent bases of operations in the Americas under Clinton. They didn't need to because Uncle Bill gladly invited them over for a beach party. See Operation Cooperative Osprey: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... osprey.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. I was one of the "escorts" for the former enemies of our state and diligently trained them in humanitarian assistance, check points, convoy ops and some other things. No need to set up a base when they can just use ours! :banghead:
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: What happens with a weak president who likes commies....

Post by The Annoyed Man »

AlphaWhiskey wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:The Russians wouldn't have done it with Clinton.
Well, true, they didn't try to set up permanent bases of operations in the Americas under Clinton. They didn't need to because Uncle Bill gladly invited them over for a beach party. See Operation Cooperative Osprey: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... osprey.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. I was one of the "escorts" for the former enemies of our state and diligently trained them in humanitarian assistance, check points, convoy ops and some other things. No need to set up a base when they can just use ours! :banghead:
The countries listed on that page are:
The troops came from Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kyrgistan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Romania, the Slovak Republic, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. There are three NATO nations, Canada, The Netherlands and the U.S.A., joining the exercise. Azerbaijan, the Czech Republic and Denmark participated as observers.
Further down the page, it says:
Partner nations participating were Albania, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.
Then below that, it says:
Approximately 150 military personnel from 19 nations participated in a multinational NATO Command Post Exercise COOPERATIVE OSPREY 2001

.....


Six NATO nations (Canada, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United States of America) participated together with thirteen partner nations (Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Krghyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden, and the Ukraine). Three Mediterranean Dialogue nations participated as military observers (Algeria, Jordan, and Mauritania).
Russia isn't listed anywhere as a participant. Albania, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakstan, Romania, Ukraine, and Usbekistan are all nations that have spun off with the breakup of the USSR and all have nacent (some further along than others) democracy movements and are trying very hard to get out from under the hegemonistic sway of Russia. The Ukraine and Georgia in particular have paid very heavy prices for their independence, while the Russian GRU (used to be the KGB) has poisoned their politicians and corrupted their voting processes. In 2008, Russia ginned up phony reasons to invade Georgia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_South_Ossetia_war) and carve off a significant chunk of Georgian territory for itself.

My point is, these nations were nowhere near the same threat to the U.S. that Russia was/is, and I'm not convinced that fostering military cooperation with them wasn't the right thing to do. They were fighting communism. They were trying to break away from old Soviet influences. It seems to me like including them in Cooperative Osprey 2001 was probably a very good idea. Maybe if the cooperation had been greater, Russia wouldn't have carved off a piece of Georgian territory on the thinnest of excuses.

I would add that the invasion came near the end of George Bush's lame duck year as outgoing president, with a democrat polling highly as his replacement. Putin might well have gambled that Bush would not be able to respond, and an incoming democrat would be too big of a wussie to respond.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”