AlphaWhiskey wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:The Russians wouldn't have done it with Clinton.
Well, true, they didn't try to set up permanent bases of operations in the Americas under Clinton. They didn't need to because Uncle Bill gladly invited them over for a beach party. See Operation Cooperative Osprey:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... osprey.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. I was one of the "escorts" for the former enemies of our state and diligently trained them in humanitarian assistance, check points, convoy ops and some other things. No need to set up a base when they can just use ours!

The countries listed on that page are:
The troops came from Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kyrgistan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Romania, the Slovak Republic, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. There are three NATO nations, Canada, The Netherlands and the U.S.A., joining the exercise. Azerbaijan, the Czech Republic and Denmark participated as observers.
Further down the page, it says:
Partner nations participating were Albania, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.
Then below that, it says:
Approximately 150 military personnel from 19 nations participated in a multinational NATO Command Post Exercise COOPERATIVE OSPREY 2001
.....
Six NATO nations (Canada, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United States of America) participated together with thirteen partner nations (Albania, Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Krghyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden, and the Ukraine). Three Mediterranean Dialogue nations participated as military observers (Algeria, Jordan, and Mauritania).
Russia isn't listed anywhere as a participant. Albania, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakstan, Romania, Ukraine, and Usbekistan are all nations that have spun off with the breakup of the USSR and all have nacent (some further along than others) democracy movements and are trying very hard to get out from under the hegemonistic sway of Russia. The Ukraine and Georgia in particular have paid very heavy prices for their independence, while the Russian GRU (used to be the KGB) has poisoned their politicians and corrupted their voting processes. In 2008, Russia ginned up phony reasons to invade Georgia (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_South_Ossetia_war) and carve off a significant chunk of Georgian territory for itself.
My point is, these nations were nowhere near the same threat to the U.S. that Russia was/is, and I'm not convinced that fostering military cooperation with them wasn't the right thing to do. They were fighting communism. They were trying to break away from old Soviet influences. It seems to me like including them in Cooperative Osprey 2001 was probably a very good idea. Maybe if the cooperation had been greater, Russia wouldn't have carved off a piece of Georgian territory on the thinnest of excuses.
I would add that the invasion came near the end of George Bush's lame duck year as outgoing president, with a democrat polling highly as his replacement. Putin might well have gambled that Bush would not be able to respond, and an incoming democrat would be too big of a wussie to respond.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT