Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
A-R
Senior Member
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by A-R »

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... your-guns/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts: 9607
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by RoyGBiv »

I need to get an NRA hat... I wish they made one that had ANY modern styling.
Every NRA hat I've ever seen fits me like it came off the $2.99 rack at the bait shop near the lake.

Like this one... Great looking graphics, but look at how high that hat is.. :roll:
http://www.nrastore.com/nrastore/Produc ... 24172&ct=e" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by AEA »

When these reporters are talking to these idiot Dems and they spew their spiel on "reasonable restrictions" & "common sense laws" and "AWB", why does the reporter NOT ask them what is it they don't understand about the words "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"? :banghead:
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
EconDoc
Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by EconDoc »

AEA wrote:When these reporters are talking to these idiot Dems and they spew their spiel on "reasonable restrictions" & "common sense laws" and "AWB", why does the reporter NOT ask them what is it they don't understand about the words "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"? :banghead:
They understand those words very well. Their problem is that, if they obey those words, they will not be able to turn free citizens into unarmed, defenseless peasants who can be ruled, exploited, and eliminated safely. Never kid your self. Talk about crime is pure smokescreen. It is really about power and people who believe that we have too much power over ourselves and they have too little power over us.

:patriot: :txflag:
Sauron lives and his orc minions are on the march. Free people own guns.
User avatar
Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by Beiruty »

More Money for NRA.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by sjfcontrol »

Jesse Jackson wrote:Twenty-five percent of all police are killed by assault weapons, and they cannot defend themselves from that.
Would that be 25% of all police each year? I had no idea the death rate was anywhere near that high! :evil2:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
SRH78
Senior Member
Posts: 513
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:53 pm

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by SRH78 »

EconDoc wrote:
AEA wrote:When these reporters are talking to these idiot Dems and they spew their spiel on "reasonable restrictions" & "common sense laws" and "AWB", why does the reporter NOT ask them what is it they don't understand about the words "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"? :banghead:
They understand those words very well. Their problem is that, if they obey those words, they will not be able to turn free citizens into unarmed, defenseless peasants who can be ruled, exploited, and eliminated safely. Never kid your self. Talk about crime is pure smokescreen. It is really about power and people who believe that we have too much power over ourselves and they have too little power over us.

:patriot: :txflag:
:iagree: bingo
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by RPB »

sjfcontrol wrote:
Jesse Jackson wrote:Twenty-five percent of all police are killed by assault weapons, and they cannot defend themselves from that.
Would that be 25% of all police each year? I had no idea the death rate was anywhere near that high! :evil2:
Perhaps if police didn't carry those assault weapons, they'd be less convenient/available and police wouldn't be killed by the assault weapons as often. Look at the 9 bystanders who got shot by police recently. More range time might help too.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by RPB »

sjfcontrol wrote:
Jesse Jackson wrote:Twenty-five percent of all police are killed by assault weapons, and they cannot defend themselves from that.
Would that be 25% of all police each year? I had no idea the death rate was anywhere near that high! :evil2:
Perhaps if police didn't carry those assault weapons, they'd be less convenient/available and police wouldn't be killed by the assault weapons as often. Disarm the Police like in New Zealand and you'd have less. Look at the 9 bystanders who got shot by police recently. More range time might help too.

NZ Police didn't used to wear guns, but several had near-death experiences as bad guys armed themselves.

Retention versus availability/access
:shock: :eek6 Video: Good discussion on should police leave the gun in the car or wear it on a belt like in the wild west, which is more risky for police
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=jN8fNklvtNI[/youtube]

Broad vows to give police greater gun access
http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/union-w ... ip-3966827" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Public split on police gun issue
http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/ ... -gun-issue" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
2004
http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/waitara29b.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Carrying guns in a holster on the hip is still not routine for New Zealand police officers - but don't ask to see what's under their armpits or in their car boots. Rachel Grunwell reports on the police officer's arsenal.

Senior frontline police carry as many as six firearms in the boots of their cars.
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=WKMo537wFhw[/youtube]

Why NZ Police shouldn't have guns
http://tumeke.blogspot.com/2012/04/why- ... -guns.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
panicked cops reaching for the trigger first without justification.
Deja Vu- the old "blood will run in the Streets" argument used by anti CHL. anti-campus carry, anti-gun brady groups ...
Last edited by RPB on Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by AEA »

SRH78 wrote:
EconDoc wrote:
AEA wrote:When these reporters are talking to these idiot Dems and they spew their spiel on "reasonable restrictions" & "common sense laws" and "AWB", why does the reporter NOT ask them what is it they don't understand about the words "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"? :banghead:
They understand those words very well. Their problem is that, if they obey those words, they will not be able to turn free citizens into unarmed, defenseless peasants who can be ruled, exploited, and eliminated safely. Never kid your self. Talk about crime is pure smokescreen. It is really about power and people who believe that we have too much power over ourselves and they have too little power over us.

:patriot: :txflag:
:iagree: bingo
Yes, I get that. :thumbs2:

My point was why don't the Reporters throw that back into their face when they spout off their rhetoric? Force them to answer that question? :rules: :???:
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
User avatar
E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by E.Marquez »

sjfcontrol wrote:
Jesse Jackson wrote:Twenty-five percent of all police are killed by assault weapons, and they cannot defend themselves from that.
Would that be 25% of all police each year? I had no idea the death rate was anywhere near that high! :evil2:
173 LEO deaths in 2011

67 of those by gun fire.. thats %38 but hold on,,, some of those are listed as acidental..
and
I checked 20 of those reports, NONE listed the weapon type as anything that can be considered as an "assault weapon"

Total Line of Duty Deaths: 173
9/11 related illness: 6
Aircraft accident: 1
Animal related: 1
Assault: 5
Automobile accident: 35
Drowned: 4
Duty related illness: 7
Explosion: 1
Gunfire: 67
Gunfire (Accidental): 5
Heart attack: 11
Heat exhaustion: 1
Motorcycle accident: 5
Stabbed: 2
Struck by vehicle: 4
Training accident: 1
Vehicle pursuit: 4
Vehicular assault: 12
Weather/Natural disaster: 1


Read more: http://www.odmp.org/search/year/2011#ixzz25o2IOig6" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

2012 78 deaths tracked on this site so far 31 by gunfire... checked 10, none by "assault weapon"
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by sjfcontrol »

bronco78 wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:
Jesse Jackson wrote:Twenty-five percent of all police are killed by assault weapons, and they cannot defend themselves from that.
Would that be 25% of all police each year? I had no idea the death rate was anywhere near that high! :evil2:
173 LEO deaths in 2011

67 of those by gun fire.. thats %38 but hold on,,, some of those are listed as acidental..
and
I checked 20 of those reports, NONE listed the weapon type as anything that can be considered as an "assault weapon"

Total Line of Duty Deaths: 173
9/11 related illness: 6
Aircraft accident: 1
Animal related: 1
Assault: 5
Automobile accident: 35
Drowned: 4
Duty related illness: 7
Explosion: 1
Gunfire: 67
Gunfire (Accidental): 5
Heart attack: 11
Heat exhaustion: 1
Motorcycle accident: 5
Stabbed: 2
Struck by vehicle: 4
Training accident: 1
Vehicle pursuit: 4
Vehicular assault: 12
Weather/Natural disaster: 1


Read more: http://www.odmp.org/search/year/2011#ixzz25o2IOig6" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

2012 78 deaths tracked on this site so far 31 by gunfire... checked 10, none by "assault weapon"
I don't think you understand the point. Jesse said it's 25 % of ALL POLICE, not 25% of those killed. So, there are 36,000 police in NYC, therefore 9000 per year must be getting killed by assault weapons.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by RPB »

Image

I didn't catch the math, but found the assertion ridiculous; even considering what the author meant, though it's even more so with the way it was stated.
Last edited by RPB on Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar
E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by E.Marquez »

sjfcontrol wrote:I don't think you understand the point. Jesse said it's 25 % of ALL POLICE, not 25% of those killed. So, there are 36,000 police in NYC, therefore 9000 per year must be getting killed by assault weapons.
No i understood he was making fun of a poorly worded sentence.

I was speaking to the lie the statement is regardless of the poor sentence structure used by the author.
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Heartland Patriot

Re: Emily Miller: Hide Your Guns

Post by Heartland Patriot »

The article references the line "an honest, open national conversation about firearms.” from the Democrat Party platform. But what that line REALLY means is "what are you willing to let us take away from you now in regards to guns?"
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”