Electoral Votes

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

grim-bob
Senior Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:04 pm

Re: Electoral Votes

Post by grim-bob »

pbwalker wrote:A Doctor should never choose to perform, or not perform, a procedure based on their religious beliefs. A Pharmacist should not decide whether or not to fill a script for the morning after pill based on their religious beliefs. That is wrong. That is imposing their beliefs on someone else. If they don't like it, they can find another job. It's akin to saying "Sorry, I am not going use this defib on you because you don't believe in <insert some character here>".

:tiphat:
This is a typical selfish argument that only considers one side of the equation. Try turning that very argument 180 degrees.

A patient should never demand a doctor to perform a procedure against the doctors religious beliefs. A patient should never demand a pharmacist to fill a script for the morning after pill which is against their religious beliefs. That is wrong. That is imposing the patients beliefs on the doctor and pharmacist. If the patient doesn't like it, they can find another doctor or pharmacist.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander and all.....
Josh

Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: Electoral Votes

Post by pbwalker »

grim-bob wrote:
pbwalker wrote:A Doctor should never choose to perform, or not perform, a procedure based on their religious beliefs. A Pharmacist should not decide whether or not to fill a script for the morning after pill based on their religious beliefs. That is wrong. That is imposing their beliefs on someone else. If they don't like it, they can find another job. It's akin to saying "Sorry, I am not going use this defib on you because you don't believe in <insert some character here>".

:tiphat:
This is a typical selfish argument that only considers one side of the equation. Try turning that very argument 180 degrees.

A patient should never demand a doctor to perform a procedure against the doctors religious beliefs. A patient should never demand a pharmacist to fill a script for the morning after pill which is against their religious beliefs. That is wrong. That is imposing the patients beliefs on the doctor and pharmacist. If the patient doesn't like it, they can find another doctor or pharmacist.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander and all.....
So, to me, it sounds like we need to remove the religious involvement in medicine. :cheers2:
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
tamc9395

Re: Electoral Votes

Post by tamc9395 »

Moderators. I request under rule 11 that this be deleted and the topic locked. I can to be a censor.
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Electoral Votes

Post by Dave2 »

pbwalker wrote:
grim-bob wrote:
pbwalker wrote:A Doctor should never choose to perform, or not perform, a procedure based on their religious beliefs. A Pharmacist should not decide whether or not to fill a script for the morning after pill based on their religious beliefs. That is wrong. That is imposing their beliefs on someone else. If they don't like it, they can find another job. It's akin to saying "Sorry, I am not going use this defib on you because you don't believe in <insert some character here>".

:tiphat:
This is a typical selfish argument that only considers one side of the equation. Try turning that very argument 180 degrees.

A patient should never demand a doctor to perform a procedure against the doctors religious beliefs. A patient should never demand a pharmacist to fill a script for the morning after pill which is against their religious beliefs. That is wrong. That is imposing the patients beliefs on the doctor and pharmacist. If the patient doesn't like it, they can find another doctor or pharmacist.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander and all.....
So, to me, it sounds like we need to remove the religious involvement in medicine. :cheers2:
What's the point of having morals (whatever their source) if you're not at least trying to live by them?

Edit: I mean it seems to me that your position is that any moral disagreements are automatically one party imposing their beliefs on the other, but that simply isn't the case. If I were a doctor and I refused to do a certain procedure or prescribe certain drugs, I'm not preventing you from doing anything, nor am I requiring you to do anything you find morally wrong; I'm merely refusing to participate in something I believe to be wrong. Preventing you from finding a different doctor who'll help you would be imposing my beliefs.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
longtooth
Senior Member
Posts: 12329
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Angelina County

Re: Electoral Votes

Post by longtooth »

So off topic it is locked.
Image
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
Locked

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”