MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
Another great video from a great American:
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=0R3uLTnzs60[/youtube]
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=0R3uLTnzs60[/youtube]
Armed not dangerous but potentially lethal.
CHL Application mailed 10/2/12
Plastic in hand 11/16/12
CHL Application mailed 10/2/12
Plastic in hand 11/16/12
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
I really like this guy.
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
One of the few youtube channels I follow. I could do without the Walking Dead videos since I'm not a fan of the show.
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
Colion should be a spokesman for the NRA... he is articulate, knowledgeable, young and cool.
Alex
NRA Benefactor Life & TSRA Life Member
Bay Area Shooting Club Member
CHL since 7/12 | 28 days mailbox-to-mailbox
NRA Benefactor Life & TSRA Life Member
Bay Area Shooting Club Member
CHL since 7/12 | 28 days mailbox-to-mailbox
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:36 pm
- Location: Corpus Christi , TX
- Contact:
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
I love his last line...."when they come out with something better, I'm gonna want that too'.






Carry safe and carry when and where you can. I'm just sayin'.
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
I subscribed to him awhile ago. Yes, I agree. NRA should reach out to him.
“I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant”
NRA- Life member
TSRA - Conditional Life Member
NRA- Life member

TSRA - Conditional Life Member

- Wodathunkit
- Senior Member
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 11:18 am
- Location: Friendswood, Texas
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
I need him to speak for me. He says what I try to say without me screwing it up.
"Character is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking" - J.C. watts Jr.
CHL since Jan. 2013
53 days mailbox to mailbox.
CHL since Jan. 2013
53 days mailbox to mailbox.
-
- Member
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:17 am
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
Nicely put together but it's simple: "because I can."
- Jumping Frog
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5488
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
- Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
Next time I am voting for NRA BOD, he will be a write-in vote.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
+1 on that, Bob...Jumping Frog wrote:Next time I am voting for NRA BOD, he will be a write-in vote.
Alex
NRA Benefactor Life & TSRA Life Member
Bay Area Shooting Club Member
CHL since 7/12 | 28 days mailbox-to-mailbox
NRA Benefactor Life & TSRA Life Member
Bay Area Shooting Club Member
CHL since 7/12 | 28 days mailbox-to-mailbox
-
- Member
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:31 pm
- Location: hutto, tx
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
Seabear wrote:I love his last line...."when they come out with something better, I'm gonna want that too'.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
x2
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
Mrcolionoir is the man! Been wathcing him for a while now.
Question everything
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
It's off topic but another good vid about why we need "assault rifles". I have to say I was surprised. I apologize if this was already posted.
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=W93dVftvMrw[/youtube]
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=W93dVftvMrw[/youtube]
U R Noodle
CHL since 1/26/2012 - 41 days mailbox to mailbox
CHL since 1/26/2012 - 41 days mailbox to mailbox
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
My only objection is that an assault rifle is not a semi-automatic rifle. He commingles the two terms way too much for for my taste.Gameover wrote:Mrcolionoir is the man! Been wathcing him for a while now.
I think that's one of the intrinsic problems we face: the libs think any semi-automatic version of an M4 is an "assault rifle."
It isn't. It's simply a rifle that looks like a military rifle. It looks that way because the basic operating platform has proven, over decades, to be solid and reliable. That's why we own it.
An AR-15 can only fire one tiny round--hey, it's essentially a .22, after all--with one squeeze of the trigger. It can't do burst fire; it can't go full auto. It is not an assault rifle.
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Re: MrColionoir-Why I NEED an Assault RIfle
Exactly! Too many of the "talking heads" on TV and other media go unchallenged by supposedly knowledgeable pro gun experts when it comes to "assault rifles." You'd think that would be the first thing they would challenge, especially when the conversation is about a ban of something that they are NOT. The first answer I would have to any question about an assault rifle ban is, "Do you know what is an assault rifle is, and do you know that the weapons you are proposing for this ban are not assault rifles, not military rifles, are not machine guns, and have no fully automatic function, and simply resemble what you are proposing to ban?" I'm sure they would be met with answers that show that the questioner has no idea. My next sentence would be, "then you are proposing a ban on weapons you know nothing about, or are grossly ignorant about, and are misleading the public."Skiprr wrote:My only objection is that an assault rifle is not a semi-automatic rifle. He commingles the two terms way too much for for my taste.Gameover wrote:Mrcolionoir is the man! Been wathcing him for a while now.
I think that's one of the intrinsic problems we face: the libs think any semi-automatic version of an M4 is an "assault rifle."
It isn't. It's simply a rifle that looks like a military rifle. It looks that way because the basic operating platform has proven, over decades, to be solid and reliable. That's why we own it.
An AR-15 can only fire one tiny round--hey, it's essentially a .22, after all--with one squeeze of the trigger. It can't do burst fire; it can't go full auto. It is not an assault rifle.