Police vs CHL crime

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked
CJD
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:38 pm
Location: Conroe

Police vs CHL crime

Post by CJD »

A while ago I posted about an officer that took my having a legal weapon under chl as probable cause to examine the rest of my legal weapons. I just looked up some quick stats, and found that police are statistically more likely to commit crimes than chl holders (about .5% as opposed to .0003% of their respective populations). So shouldn't I be inherently more afraid of him because HE (she) has a gun than they should be afraid of me having a gun, based on evidence? Do I get to examine their weapons? Sorry, I just don't like double standards, and wanted to hear other people's input.

Correction: .5% is the rate of reporting of misconduct, so a lot are probably untrue. But that value is still 1666 times bigger, so even saying 1% are true, this still stands
Last edited by CJD on Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CJD
Senior Member
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:38 pm
Location: Conroe

Re: Police vs CHL crime

Post by CJD »

This isn't directly relevant, but this shows compared to general population, let alone chl holders whose rate is much lower.
Attachments
Screenshot_2013-01-24-12-41-14.png
texanjoker

Re: Police vs CHL crime

Post by texanjoker »

CJD wrote:A while ago I posted about an officer that took my having a legal weapon under chl as probable cause to examine the rest of my legal weapons. I just looked up some quick stats, and found that police are statistically more likely to commit crimes than chl holders (about .5% as opposed to .0003% of their respective populations). So shouldn't I be inherently more afraid of him because HE (she) has a gun than they should be afraid of me having a gun, based on evidence? Do I get to examine their weapons? Sorry, I just don't like double standards, and wanted to hear other people's input.

Correction: .5% is the rate of reporting of misconduct, so a lot are probably untrue. But that value is still 1666 times bigger, so even saying 1% are true, this still stands
Here we go again, another post to either slam LEO's or compare CHL to LEO's. :smash:

Your post is confusing and then you correct yourself. What exactly is the "reporting of misconduct?" That doesn't mean a whole lot and does not imply any criminal conviction. Are those simply somebody allegedly reporting misconduct or founded reports or criminal convictions or something with no merit? If it's just a reported complaint, that doesn't mean squat. People file false complaints all the time with no merit. If one is a proactive officer they will also receive complaints from doing good solid police work. If that is what you are referring to that is pretty lame. CHL holders are not out there contacting people so they don't receive complaints.
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Police vs CHL crime

Post by Keith B »

Your stats show General Population, not CHL holders, so not really even relevant due to the ratios. As well, looks like the stats quoted in the chart don't even match the text. Since this has been discussed ad infinitum in other threads and this is not valid data posted, we are not going to start another thread here.

Topic locked.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
Locked

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”