

35.9% of TX population own guns
9,217,210 gun owners
http://nyagv.org/wp-content/uploads/201 ... -State.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Is that all? I would have thought it would be greater than that.JJVP wrote:Way to go TX.![]()
![]()
35.9% of TX population own guns
9,217,210 gun owners
http://nyagv.org/wp-content/uploads/201 ... -State.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm never sure how they come up with those numbers. I've done several FTF transactions that are not on anyone's radar.tomtexan wrote:Is that all? I would have thought it would be greater than that.JJVP wrote:Way to go TX.![]()
![]()
35.9% of TX population own guns
9,217,210 gun owners
http://nyagv.org/wp-content/uploads/201 ... -State.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In other words, there is no consistent data collection State to State.Data for a state may be collected directly by the state health department or through a contractor. Fourteen state health departments collected their data in-house; forty contracted data collection to university survey research centers or commercial firms in 2002
Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. "Prevalence of Household Firearms and Firearm-Storage Practices in the 50 States and the District of Columbia: Findings From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002"
2U.S.
2002? The numbers have changed significantly in the last 6 weeks!suthdj wrote:from bottom of article, I would not really trust the numbers as if they asked me or my wife the answer would be no, we have no guns., Plus the answers are from 2002. I would guess we are higher than only 9%
Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. "Prevalence of Household Firearms and Firearm-Storage Practices in the 50 States and the District of Columbia: Findings From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002"
2U.S.
Does that mean that in Kentucky CHL'ers get a NICS check once a month?Kentucky requires monthly NICS checks on concealed weapons that causes inflated numbers relative to the other states.
That's no joke. No understatement there.jmra wrote: 2002? The numbers have changed significantly in the last 6 weeks!
I think you have hit on something. Of the people I am around most of the time - friends and coworkers, I can think of very few who do not own at least one firearm. Most own more than one.VMI77 wrote:I don't believe the numbers --there are too many incentives for low balling the estimates, and other factors that tend to limit getting correct information in the direction of under estimation. I'm not saying where I work is representative of the general population, and the numbers are no doubt lower in the major urban areas, but I don't even know anyone who doesn't own more than one gun. Also, how are "owners" counted? When my kids were young, each had his own guns, but the kids and wife also shared in shooting "my" guns. I consider the ownership between my wife and I to be "communal." So, would we have counted as one gun owner, two gun owners, or four?
When I see the document is "Produced by New Yorkers Against Gun Violence", then I am done. It has zero credibility in my book so I no longer care what is says.