HB48: Passed

This sub-forum will open for posting on Sept. 1, 2012.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by AEA »

:iagree: :txflag:
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
thatguy
Senior Member
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 6:56 am
Location: League City
Contact:

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by thatguy »

While conviction rates are extraordinarily low for CHL holder's I hope lowering the standards doesn't reverse the trend...
In the endless pursuit of perfection, we may achieve excellence.

Texas LTC and School Safety Instructor and NRA Training Counselor
longtooth
Senior Member
Posts: 12329
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Angelina County

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by longtooth »

The closer we get to the Constitution "shall not be infringed" is raising the standards.

What folks fail to remember is "Accountability" Folks have got to stand on the Constitution & make sure they educate themselves & "TRAIN" to proficency level they are physically able to accomplish.

I confess there will be those that will come one time & then never "practice" let alone "train" any more.
Just because we as Instructors see that now does not justify the infringement on the inalignable rights of the rest of us.
Image
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
User avatar
RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts: 5060
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by RPBrown »

TexasCajun wrote:
RPBrown wrote:This is great.

However, I see they took out the part about carrying on an expired license.

This does trouble me a little with the extended times it is taking DPS to do what they do to issue the license.

I guess this was another "compromise"
Not having to take a renewal class & requalify is a great win for us. The simplified process should help the DPS backlog once this has been in place for a while. With no class to take, there shouldn't be any need to carry on an expired license.
In theory I agree. However........
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by sjfcontrol »

RPBrown wrote:This is great.

However, I see they took out the part about carrying on an expired license.

This does trouble me a little with the extended times it is taking DPS to do what they do to issue the license.

I guess this was another "compromise"
What wording allowed carrying on an expired license?
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
CainA
Senior Member
Posts: 582
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:25 pm
Location: Houston-Spring

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by CainA »

sjfcontrol wrote:
What wording allowed carrying on an expired license?
Go to page 1 of this thread and see my post.
User avatar
RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts: 5060
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by RPBrown »

sjfcontrol wrote:
RPBrown wrote:This is great.

However, I see they took out the part about carrying on an expired license.

This does trouble me a little with the extended times it is taking DPS to do what they do to issue the license.

I guess this was another "compromise"
What wording allowed carrying on an expired license?
The link below was the original text. Go to section G

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/ ... navpanes=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
User avatar
Jaguar
Senior Member
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: Just west of Cool, Texas

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by Jaguar »

It will be interesting to see how the nuts and bolts of this work out. Photos - tests - online, mail, email, fax...

Guess I will just wait and see what going to shake out.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison
texanjoker

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by texanjoker »

While I do like this, as it saves both time and money, how is this going to effect reciprocity with other states? I guess time will tell. I imagine CHL instructors do not like this as they are now going to loose money.
RHenriksen
Senior Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:59 pm
Location: Houston

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by RHenriksen »

longtooth wrote:The closer we get to the Constitution "shall not be infringed" is raising the standards.

What folks fail to remember is "Accountability" Folks have got to stand on the Constitution & make sure they educate themselves & "TRAIN" to proficency level they are physically able to accomplish.

I confess there will be those that will come one time & then never "practice" let alone "train" any more.
Just because we as Instructors see that now does not justify the infringement on the inalignable rights of the rest of us.
Well said, sir
I'll quit carrying a gun when they make murder and armed robbery illegal

Houston Technology Consulting
soup-to-nuts IT infrastructure design, deployment, and support for SMBs
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by sjfcontrol »

RPBrown wrote:
sjfcontrol wrote:
RPBrown wrote:This is great.

However, I see they took out the part about carrying on an expired license.

This does trouble me a little with the extended times it is taking DPS to do what they do to issue the license.

I guess this was another "compromise"
What wording allowed carrying on an expired license?
The link below was the original text. Go to section G

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/ ... navpanes=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
OH -- now I see. I thought he was saying they took that part out of the CURRENT code. They took it out of the bill.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

RPBrown wrote:This is great.

However, I see they took out the part about carrying on an expired license.

This does trouble me a little with the extended times it is taking DPS to do what they do to issue the license.

I guess this was another "compromise"
That provision would have cost us our NICS exemption. There's a way to achieve the same goal without extending the effective date of a CHL beyond it's expiration date. I'll draft a bill to accomplish this for the 2015 session.

Chas.
longtooth
Senior Member
Posts: 12329
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Angelina County

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by longtooth »

Leave it out then. Sometimes on this sode of the bill we dont see it all.
I sure dont want to loose that.
Image
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

texanjoker wrote:While I do like this, as it saves both time and money, how is this going to effect reciprocity with other states?
That's the big question mark.

Chas.
User avatar
RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts: 5060
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: HB48: Passed

Post by RPBrown »

longtooth wrote:Leave it out then. Sometimes on this sode of the bill we dont see it all.
I sure dont want to loose that.

I agree.
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
Post Reply

Return to “2013 Texas Legislative Session”