Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

TxD
Senior Member
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Friendswood Tx

Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by TxD »

This will be a very interesting trial.

"All six of the jurors selected are women, and five are white. The descriptions below, including the age and race or ethnicity of potential jurors, are based on the observations of a reporter in the courtroom."

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/loc ... 7776.story" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Black Rifles Matter
User avatar
RX8er
Senior Member
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:36 pm
Location: Northeast Fort Worth

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by RX8er »

The 4 alternates are women as well.
Final Shot offers Firearms / FFL Transfers / CHL Instruction. Please like our Facebook Page.
If guns kill people, do pens misspell words?
I like options: Sig Sauer | DPMS | Springfield Armory | Glock | Beretta
Panda
Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:45 pm

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by Panda »

RX8er wrote:The 4 alternates are women as well.
Are you calling arm wrestling dude a girly man? :biggrinjester:
User avatar
RX8er
Senior Member
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:36 pm
Location: Northeast Fort Worth

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by RX8er »

Yes, I was being sarcastic.
Final Shot offers Firearms / FFL Transfers / CHL Instruction. Please like our Facebook Page.
If guns kill people, do pens misspell words?
I like options: Sig Sauer | DPMS | Springfield Armory | Glock | Beretta
RottenApple
Senior Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by RottenApple »

Only 6 on the jury? I thought it was supposed to be 12.
Ameer
Senior Member
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by Ameer »

RottenApple wrote:Only 6 on the jury? I thought it was supposed to be 12.
http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_927" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Court concluded that "the fact that the jury at common law was composed of precisely 12 is a historical accident, unnecessary to effect the purposes of the jury system and wholly without significance 'except to mystics.'"
I believe the basic political division in this country is not between liberals and conservatives but between those who believe that they should have a say in the personal lives of strangers and those who do not.
knotquiteawake
Senior Member
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:18 am
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by knotquiteawake »

This doesn't seem like a good thing... All woman jury.

What do you guys think?
Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

knotquiteawake wrote:This doesn't seem like a good thing... All woman jury.

What do you guys think?

Its an excellent jury for the defense. On the primary jury you have:
*one person who used this as a story to keep her kids home after dark.
*a former CHLer (yea they're going to convict)
*one who has a husband with firearms.

The defense managed to exclude lots of categories that would go against them, and we have to remember they can only go through the jury pool that was picked.
knotquiteawake
Senior Member
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:18 am
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by knotquiteawake »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
knotquiteawake wrote:This doesn't seem like a good thing... All woman jury.

What do you guys think?

Its an excellent jury for the defense. On the primary jury you have:
*one person who used this as a story to keep her kids home after dark.
*a former CHLer (yea they're going to convict)
*one who has a husband with firearms.

The defense managed to exclude lots of categories that would go against them, and we have to remember they can only go through the jury pool that was picked.
Ah, I hadn't read the second page of the article where is described every juror. It doesn't look so bad. I can't see how those people would possibly get 6 votes to convict.
User avatar
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by baldeagle »

RX8er wrote:The 4 alternates are women as well.
Two are men.
These are the alternates:

E-54: A middle-aged white man with a teenage stepson who wears hoodies. He recalled seeing photos of Zimmerman's head and face that show injuries. E-54 loves golf and genealogy, and said he's been married for five years to a technical engineer. He grew up in Seminole County and has a teenage stepson.

B-72: A young man who is possibly Hispanic, does maintenance at a school and competes in arm wrestling tournaments. He said he avoids the news because he does not want to be "brainwashed." He grew up in Chicago, is single and an alumni of Phi Beta Kappa. He is very physically active, and was a high school athlete. He said that he doesn't believe you can determine a person's strength based solely on their size or how they look.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar
Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by Beiruty »

With the evidence at hand, more specifically, a broken nose and bleeding head and no injuries on the other party. It is clear who was the aggressor and who was the one on the receiving end of the blows. The jury would render a not guilty in a flash. Enough of the appeasing a minority who claim that they are still suffering oppression that ended some 50 or 60 yrs ago.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
mamabearCali
Senior Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by mamabearCali »

It seems to be a good thing. As stated above several of them seem pretty reasonable people. It seems the foxes were weeded out.
SAHM to four precious children. Wife to a loving husband.

"The women of this country learned long ago those without swords can still die upon them!" Eowyn in LOTR Two Towers
Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

Beiruty wrote:With the evidence at hand, more specifically, a broken nose and bleeding head and no injuries on the other party. It is clear who was the aggressor and who was the one on the receiving end of the blows. The jury would render a not guilty in a flash. Enough of the appeasing a minority who claim that they are still suffering oppression that ended some 50 or 60 yrs ago.

"Not so fast there Sparky"
Again I don't know the burden of proof which matters a whole heck of a lot. Its not a default to lawful self defense. The default is to mainslaughter or higher (whatever the Florida statute is) the moment Z says he shot.

He has to prove he was actually attacked or in fear of his life or whatever the standard for self defense is in Florida. The prosecution can put forth that he actually attacked or threatened T, causing T to act in his own self defense. I'd proffer it would then be Z's burden to disprove that.
-We have a witness that saw T on top of Z attacking. That support's Z at that pouint but it doesn't stop the prosecution move that T was actually defending himself from attack.
-We have an earwitness (I think) that can testify that T was worried about soeone following him - supporting the T defense move
-We have the cellphone call. If the prosecution can convince the jury that thats T then Z is in trouble. inversely same to same, or if there's enough doubt about it.

What will help is if Z's physical location at time of the incident supports him walking back to the truck at the time of the altercation. It would denote a mental state of both following orders, and attempting to leave the pursuit to the police, and not being a vigilante.

I think Z gets off based on the jury and secondarily the evidence available, but its no slam dunk.
howdy
Senior Member
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:16 pm
Location: Katy

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by howdy »

I am convinced this will be a hung jury and all subsequent juries will be hung until the prosecution gets the exact jury they want.

The prosecution has infinite money to retry this case and Z does not...
His fancy legal team will bow out and he will get some court appointed lawyer to carry on...
He will be under house arrest for years...
He will NEVER be able to move about freely.
Texas LTC Instructor
NRA Basic Pistol Instructor
NRA Life Patron Member TSRA Member
USMC 1972-1979
User avatar
psijac
Senior Member
Posts: 1045
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:08 am

Re: Zimmerman Jury Selected Opening Statements 6/24

Post by psijac »

howdy wrote:I am convinced this will be a hung jury and all subsequent juries will be hung until the prosecution gets the exact jury they want.

The prosecution has infinite money to retry this case and Z does not...
His fancy legal team will bow out and he will get some court appointed lawyer to carry on...
He will be under house arrest for years...
He will NEVER be able to move about freely.

^ this :grumble
07/25/09 - CHL class completed
07/31/09 - Received Pin/Packet sent.
09/23/09 - Plastic in hand!!
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”