The Fading 40

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26890
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: The Fading 40

Post by The Annoyed Man »

texanjoker wrote:....I know it has saved my bacon :rolll (couldn't resist)
Ha! Good one! :lol: Pride, Integrity and Guts, right?
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
JP171
Banned
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: The Fading 40

Post by JP171 »

that's just wrong Joker, just wrong on so many levels :lol:
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: The Fading 40

Post by gigag04 »

It's no secret I hate the .40.


And .40s are used in competitions where power factor is scored.

Other than that, why take the added perceived recoil and slower reset?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar
jmra
Senior Member
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: The Fading 40

Post by jmra »

thatguy wrote:
jmra wrote:
thatguy wrote:We should practice and train with the system that we carry, if you can draw and accurately fire you gun on demand, that's a good start. I believe shot placement will trump horsepower most of the time...

Why don't we see more .40 caliber in competitive shooting?
Because your life is not on the line in competitive shooting.
The question was actually rhetorical. The reason we don't is because it is more difficult to control muzzle flip from a .40 caliber for some shooters, thus costing time and accuracy which is important in competition and when your life is on the line.
I agree with your statement only because you included the words "some shooters". I know many who are more accurate with the .40 - it very much depends on the individual.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
JSThane
Banned
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:07 pm

Re: The Fading 40

Post by JSThane »

jmra wrote:
JSThane wrote:I'd rather carry a 9x19 (for the mag capacity, lower recoil, better accuracy) or a .45 ACP (larger bullet, lower recoil, better accuracy) than a .40. It's stuck right in between the two, offering a little of the advantages of both, but fulfilling the potential of neither.

So of course, I'm issued a .40, and my department doesn't allow for us to carry our own weapons on-duty. :banghead:
The weapon I am most accurate/comfortable with is a Glock 23. Given the abundance of conflicting statistical data, I believe it simply comes down to personal preference and the expertise of the individual.
I do carry a XDs 45 but only because it wasn't available in .40.

I find the title of this thread laughable. That being said, anyone who feels their .40 pistol or ammo is no longer trendy, feel free to give them to me. Shoot, for a small fee I'll even drive a little ways to take it off your hands.
Indeed. While I personally dislike the cartridge and the tradeoffs made in it, I don't see it going away any time soon. Too many people have signed on to it for precisely those tradeoffs, and found it acceptable, for it to disappear.

After all, it's the .40 Short and Weak, not the .45 GAP. :biggrinjester:
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”