Alaska State Troopers

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3167
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Alaska State Troopers

Post by Dave2 »

Is it just me, or does this show depict officers violating Alaskan's civil rights? It's not every interaction or anything, but it sure seems like they kinda force themselves on citizens a lot. Maybe it's just the editing or the part where they only show the "interesting" ones.

I don't know... maybe I'm over-reacting, but some of the attitudes the police have displayed on that show bug me a bit.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts: 3061
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Kyle, TX

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by OldCannon »

Reality shows should have a disclaimer at the beginning of each show that portrayals are _adjacent to_ reality, in exactly the same way that a dead squirrel on a table would be "part of this complete breakfast."
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
User avatar
Excaliber
Moderator
Posts: 6199
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by Excaliber »

Dave2 wrote:Is it just me, or does this show depict officers violating Alaskan's civil rights? It's not every interaction or anything, but it sure seems like they kinda force themselves on citizens a lot. Maybe it's just the editing or the part where they only show the "interesting" ones.

I don't know... maybe I'm over-reacting, but some of the attitudes the police have displayed on that show bug me a bit.
I've spent some time with those folks, and I can tell you for sure a lot of things are different up there. Here are a few examples:

I asked the station commander how big his area of responsibility was in square miles. He said he honestly didn't know, but he could describe it in travel time. It was about 1 1/2 hours from the eastern edge to the western edge - in a twin engine Piper Navajo aircraft.

Number of roads connecting all the villages - zero.

Transportation methods available in most areas during late fall to late spring: aircraft and dog sled.

His total complement of officers: 6

He had local representatives (not troopers) in each village who would evaluate and report complaints to help him prioritize them.

They answer every complaint - maybe not on the same day or even in the same week, but they'd eventually get around to it.

The troopers I met were rugged, competent, compassionate, and the kind of folks I'd be happy to have working for me.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
User avatar
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by baldeagle »

Wow! I can see why they would have to prioritize things. And I would think investigations would be very interesting. I assume the troopers work alone quite a bit, with backup "only" an hour away by plane? You'd better be pretty rugged. You're on your own.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts: 9609
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by RoyGBiv »

Dave2 wrote:Is it just me, or does this show depict officers violating Alaskan's civil rights? It's not every interaction or anything, but it sure seems like they kinda force themselves on citizens a lot. Maybe it's just the editing or the part where they only show the "interesting" ones.

I don't know... maybe I'm over-reacting, but some of the attitudes the police have displayed on that show bug me a bit.
I watch the show fairly regularly and have not formed the same opinion. Somewhat the opposite, actually.
I'll give it a more critical eye going forward though...
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by gigag04 »

Which civil rights did you see being violated?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3167
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by Dave2 »

gigag04 wrote:Which civil rights did you see being violated?
What got me thinking about it was when one of them went inside someone's home after the owner said no. Now, he could've seen or heard something that gave him probable cause and it just didn't make the final cut (in which case I'd be annoyed with the editors/producers), or maybe I'm unclear on when the police can enter your home without a warrant.

Also, the rules might be different when it's -10000000 degrees outside.

Attitude-wise, a couple of times an officer has made statements that make it almost seem like he or she is on a power trip, but again, it could easily be a trick of the editing.

It's not all the time. Mostly I've got a good impression of them.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by gigag04 »

Dave2 wrote:
gigag04 wrote:Which civil rights did you see being violated?
What got me thinking about it was when one of them went inside someone's home after the owner said no. Now, he could've seen or heard something that gave him probable cause and it just didn't make the final cut (in which case I'd be annoyed with the editors/producers), or maybe I'm unclear on when the police can enter your home without a warrant.

Also, the rules might be different when it's -10000000 degrees outside.

Attitude-wise, a couple of times an officer has made statements that make it almost seem like he or she is on a power trip, but again, it could easily be a trick of the editing.

It's not all the time. Mostly I've got a good impression of them.
Entry can be made sans warrant if exigent circumstances exist...not sure without seeing it. I usually think they do good work from what I've seen.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3167
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by Dave2 »

If you're curious I'll figure out which episode and such. I believe I've decided not to worry about it, though, since nobody else is. I mean if it was as bad as I thought it might be, I'm pretty sure somebody else here would've noticed.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
AlaskanInTexas
Senior Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:27 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by AlaskanInTexas »

Lived there for a quarter century and hold the Troopers in high regard. This is especially true for those covering the Bush, where circumstances are unlike anything else in the country.
User avatar
G26ster
Senior Member
Posts: 2655
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:28 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by G26ster »

For the years I flew the Alaska bush, I worked with the Alaska State Troopers occasionally and always found them to be very professional individuals with a huge task in the territory they had to cover. One thing that struck me lately though, when watching this show, was the seemingly negative reaction to folks armed with handguns in their vehicles. Alaska requires no permit for concealed or open carry, and the attitude expressed by the troopers towards armed citizens with handguns seemed surprising, and nothing like Texas. Perhaps this is due to no CHL system, so the Trooper has no idea the type of person they are dealing with, where in Texas your CHL IMO says something about your character. Not sure.
User avatar
Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by Dadtodabone »

Alaska = Wilderness. Wilderness = Wild Animals. Wild Animals = Stainless Steel Magnum Revolver.
Bear Enjoys Moose Tartare in driveway.
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=epBIr4eDRSs[/youtube]
You'd be out of mind to live, work, travel without being armed.
Preferably with something like this;
http://www.ruger.com/products/superRedh ... odels.html
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by sjfcontrol »

baldeagle wrote:Wow! I can see why they would have to prioritize things. And I would think investigations would be very interesting. I assume the troopers work alone quite a bit, with backup "only" an hour away by plane? You'd better be pretty rugged. You're on your own.
It would seem to me under those circumstances, that the people would have to be pretty rugged, too. After all, when seconds count, the police are only hours (or days) away. :cheers2:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar
Excaliber
Moderator
Posts: 6199
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by Excaliber »

Dadtodabone wrote:Alaska = Wilderness. Wilderness = Wild Animals. Wild Animals = Stainless Steel Magnum Revolver.
Bear Enjoys Moose Tartare in driveway.
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=epBIr4eDRSs[/youtube]
You'd be out of mind to live, work, travel without being armed.
Preferably with something like this;
http://www.ruger.com/products/superRedh ... odels.html
In Nome there are signs in the restaurants telling visitors how to be prepared when encountering polar bears. One of the items is "Carry weapons." When your life depends on getting things right, politically corrupt language and regressive anti survival concepts are mistakes that can't be afforded.

One can tell a lot about an area by looking at the guns on sale. The rifle selections were .22's and various models of calibers that started with 3 or 4. The .22's were for trappers to kill their catch without spoiling a lot of meat. The others were for everything else.

Interestingly I didn't see any handguns for sale. The locals have seen too much to have any confidence in their ability to make any difference in a bear attack.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
User avatar
Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: Alaska State Troopers

Post by Pawpaw »

For some reason, this thread reminded me of a joke from a different forum:

The Pope in Alaska

The Pope went on vacation for a few days to visit the rugged mountains of Alaska. He was driving along the campground when he heard a frantic commotion just at the edge of the woods.

He found a helpless Democrat wearing shorts, sandals, a 'Vote for Obama' hat and a 'Save the Trees' shirt. The man was screaming and struggling frantically, thrashing all about and trying to free himself from the grasp of a 10-foot grizzly bear.

As the Pope watched in horror, a group of Republican loggers wearing "Go Sarah" shirts came racing up. One quickly fired a .44 magnum slug right into the bear's chest. The two other men pulled the semiconscious Democrat from the bear's grasp. Then using baseball bats, the three loggers finished off the bear.

Two of the men dragged the dead grizzly onto the bed of their pickup truck, while the other tenderly placed the injured Democrat in the back seat.

As they began to leave, the Pope summoned all of them over to him. "I give you my blessing for your brave actions!" he proudly proclaimed. "I have heard there was bitter hatred between Republican loggers and Democratic environmental activists, but now I've seen with my own eyes that this is not true."

As the Pope drove off, one logger asked his buddies, "Who was that guy?" "Dude, that was the Pope," another replied. "He's in direct contact with Heaven and has access to all wisdom." "Well," the logger said, "he may have access to all wisdom, but he don't know squat about bear hunting. Is the bait still alive or do we need to go back to California and get another?"
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”