According to Texas Law,
I would submit you also have to provide ID if operating a motor vehicle but I don’t have that code in front of me.PC Sec. 38.02. FAILURE TO IDENTIFY. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.(b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has:(1) lawfully arrested the person;(2) lawfully detained the person; or(3) requested the information from a person that the peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal offense.
But the Texas law also states,
I have seen many youtube videos where an officer asks for ID but since the person was not required to provide it they did not and were either let go or arrested and later released without charges. Often the obstinate citizen is lectured, sometimes threatened, and rarely arrested even when no good cause for requiring ID is present.GC §411.205. REQUIREMENT TO DISPLAY LICENSE. (a) If a license holder is carrying a handgun on or about the license holder's person when a magistrate or a peace officer demands that the license holder display identification, the license holder shall display both the license holder's driver's license or identification certificate issued by the department and the license holder's handgun license.
So, if you are not lawfully arrested or operating a motor vehicle, are you required to comply with a magistrate or a peace officer demand to display identification if the conditions in 38.02 are not met?
Where this would get sticky is if the officer arrests you on bogus charges and you then produce ID and CHL and he finds you are armed. That might warrant a good tazing in the officer's opinion. I guess the prudent thing to do would be to surrender your 4th amendment rights when armed, but I don't like giving up one right to exercise another.
Thoughts?