And I sometimes carry a PM9 or a G19. Made you look!VMI77 wrote:I've got a Sig P938 and I love it. It's small and easy to conceal. It's not my preferred position but it even carries easily in a ankle holster.The Annoyed Man wrote:I've heard other conservative talk show hosts talk about their having a CHL and exercising their right to carry. Jon-David Wells comes immediately to mind. And I don't feel back about mentioning it here in public, if he's talking about it on the radio.Scott in Houston wrote:Well, it would bother me mainly because there are many I know who have no idea that I carry regularly, and many that I don't want to know...
But as for anyone else, it's radio. They can't see him, and even if they did, when he goes in public, nobody will remember or recognize him, so he's just as 'secret' and concealed in public as he was before.
I'm more bothered by what she said about Glock and Sig... because she's wrong!
That said, I do think it was indiscreet of Laura Ingraham to out her employee without having first secured his permission. As to Glock vs Sig, Glocks are ugly, and Sigs are heavy. I (my wife, actually) own a Glock, and I sometimes carry it. I want a Sig. . . . . .just to round out the collection, mind you. But my guess is that Ingraham touts the alleged superiority of the Sig over the Glock because she owns a Sig. I don't think her employee needs to defend his choice of gun—ESPECIALLY since he had the good sense to pick a caliber beginning with "4". . . . . .
. . . .because everybody knows that 9mm is for girls shooting mice. . . . . .
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Made you look!clarionite wrote:I've got a P239 that I love. Every student I've ever let qualify with it wants to buy it. I've had two go out and buy Sigs because of shooting that gun. It's not super light, but it's not too heavy to carry all day either.The Annoyed Man wrote: <Clipped > I want a Sig. . . . . .just to round out the collection, mind you. But my guess is that Ingraham touts the alleged superiority of the Sig over the Glock because she owns a Sig. I don't think her employee needs to defend his choice of gun—ESPECIALLY since he had the good sense to pick a caliber beginning with "4". . . . . .
. . . .because everybody knows that 9mm is for girls shooting mice. . . . . .
I think it's got the perfect balance of weight vs. recoil. Even if it does shoot a mouse killing round.

My work here is done.SQLGeek wrote:So much hatred and bigotry in one post...The Annoyed Man wrote:I've heard other conservative talk show hosts talk about their having a CHL and exercising their right to carry. Jon-David Wells comes immediately to mind. And I don't feel back about mentioning it here in public, if he's talking about it on the radio.Scott in Houston wrote:Well, it would bother me mainly because there are many I know who have no idea that I carry regularly, and many that I don't want to know...
But as for anyone else, it's radio. They can't see him, and even if they did, when he goes in public, nobody will remember or recognize him, so he's just as 'secret' and concealed in public as he was before.
I'm more bothered by what she said about Glock and Sig... because she's wrong!
That said, I do think it was indiscreet of Laura Ingraham to out her employee without having first secured his permission. As to Glock vs Sig, Glocks are ugly, and Sigs are heavy. I (my wife, actually) own a Glock, and I sometimes carry it. I want a Sig. . . . . .just to round out the collection, mind you. But my guess is that Ingraham touts the alleged superiority of the Sig over the Glock because she owns a Sig. I don't think her employee needs to defend his choice of gun—ESPECIALLY since he had the good sense to pick a caliber beginning with "4". . . . . .
. . . .because everybody knows that 9mm is for girls shooting mice. . . . . .






