Massive Voter Fraud Discovered in NC’s 2012 Election

[jmra]

Anybody wanna guess party affiliation of those 155,000 voters?

[rbwhatever1]

Well....we have one box left.

[anygunanywhere]

Well....we have one box left.

Anygunanywhere

[GlockDude26]

i've long thought that these elections are rigged by the owners of the electronic boxes....go back to paper and pen and while it may take longer to count the votes they did it for many years and i'd bet we'd have never seen this traitor in the white house.

[chasfm11]

i've long thought that these elections are rigged by the owners of the electronic boxes....go back to paper and pen and while it may take longer to count the votes they did it for many years and i'd bet we'd have never seen this traitor in the white house.

Voter ID laws help with some of this. It takes a lot more effort to create fake credentials for dead people than it does to simply go and use their names. Texas closely watches auto insurance policies, matching them up with vehicles. If the same level of scrutiny were used with the voter rolls and the obituaries, that would help, too. Of course, the politicians in many areas including NC have no interest in making sure that the vote counts are true so there is little emphasis.

I'm betting that both NY and IL (Chicago) voter records would make NC look like amateur hour if the truth were to ever come out.

[anygunanywhere]

i've long thought that these elections are rigged by the owners of the electronic boxes....go back to paper and pen and while it may take longer to count the votes they did it for many years and i'd bet we'd have never seen this traitor in the white house.

Voter ID laws help with some of this. It takes a lot more effort to create fake credentials for dead people than it does to simply go and use their names. Texas closely watches auto insurance policies, matching them up with vehicles. If the same level of scrutiny were used with the voter rolls and the obituaries, that would help, too. Of course, the politicians in many areas including NC have no interest in making sure that the vote counts are true so there is little emphasis.

I'm betting that both NY and IL (Chicago) voter records would make NC look like amateur hour if the truth were to ever come out.

Do not forget Kalifornia.

Anygunanywhere

[Charles L. Cotton]

I must admit that I never considered interstate voter fraud.

Chas.

[MotherBear]

Voter ID laws help with some of this. It takes a lot more effort to create fake credentials for dead people than it does to simply go and use their names. Texas closely watches auto insurance policies, matching them up with vehicles. If the same level of scrutiny were used with the voter rolls and the obituaries, that would help, too. Of course, the politicians in many areas including NC have no interest in making sure that the vote counts are true so there is little emphasis.

But don't you know that voter ID laws are just an evil Republican plan to keep women from voting for Wendy Davis? Because women are more likely to change their names, and expecting them to make sure their driver's license gets updated (as is legally required anyway) is akin to requiring them to fetch the golden fleece. At least, that was the gist of news articles I read before the last election. They were so overly dramatic about it I actually thought it must the The Onion... but it wasn't. And when I went to vote I realized that my voter's registration card has my name as Firstname Maidenname Lastname, whereas my legal name (and what's on my driver's license) is Firstname Middlename Lastname. I have no idea where they got the construction on my voter's registration, since I've never used it anywhere. All the same, no one batted an eye and I voted just fine. Maybe because the law is reasonable and takes that sort of thing into account.

[karder]

Not surprising at all. I have always believed that voter fraud was the only thing that got BHO back for a second round. The problem is, what is going to be done about it? Sadly nothing. Groups like ACORN, among others, have been involved in voter fraud for years, without any significant consequences. Government officials won't charge them and the big media outlets won't touch the story so there is no reason for them to stop. I am starting to fear that the dummies are the guys like us who believe in following the rules and being honest.

[Jim Beaux]

When the issue of voter validation is discussed, the dems scream disenfranchisement of minorities while obscuring the fact that the actual disenfranchisement is of the valid voter.

Simple logic leads one to conclude that if an individual is unmotivated to procure a photo id then he probably isnt motivated to participate in our government. If he cannot read or speak the language of the land, then it must be assumed he is uninformed and ignorant of the issues & candidate platforms. Considering the dishonest practices within the political industry it is not unreasonable to suspect these people's intent to vote.

As my below signature states: "The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are now out numbered by those who vote for a living."

[anygunanywhere]

Don't be too smug. Wasn't it dead people in the valley that put LBJ in Washington?

I think we are still paying for his so called war on poverty. Kind of adds substance to the fact that if the government declares war on something it will flourish.

Anygunanywhere

[ELB]

i've long thought that these elections are rigged by the owners of the electronic boxes....go back to paper and pen and while it may take longer to count the votes they did it for many years and i'd bet we'd have never seen this traitor in the white house.

A bet you would lose.
There are a ton of people thinking people in this country who are happy to have the government force "rich people" pay for their birth control (not that helps prevent more such people being produced, apparently). It ain't Diebold* that put him there. In fact, when I worked as an election clerk, I was told very seriously several times that Diebold was owned by the REPUBLICANS! and they were rigging the elections! Horrors! (So how did that Obama guy get there?)

There was no shortage of phony paper ballots in previous times (in LBJ's case, I am not sure they even bothered to make up phony ballots, I think that county just waited until the last minute to see how many votes he needed to win and phoned it in). When the people running the system are crooked, it doesn't matter what the technology is.

Also not the issue covered in the OP, which is about registering voters, not about ballots. You wouldn't need to create phony voter registrations or double vote if it were easy to just concoct phony ballots, paper or electronic.

It was reported in previous elections that there were quite a few New Yorkers who retired and moved to Florida and registered to vote there... but kept their registration in NY as well. And voted in both places. But noticing these things is voter suppression, somehow, or racism or something.

If anything voter REGISTRATION should become more digitized and comparisons between databases done. But the Democrats blow a fuse when this happens. Florida was trying to run their lists of convicted felons against the voter registration lists, and lawsuits followed. I'm sure North Carolina will be pilloried by the Dems and the MSM (but I repeat myself) for their efforts.

* Diebold makes electronic voting machines used in our county.

[nightmare]

• 765 voters with an exact match of first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in N.C. and the other state in the 2012 general election.

• 35,750 voters with the same first and last name and DOB were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in both states in the 2012 general election.

• 155,692 voters with the same first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state – and the latest date of registration or voter activity did not take place within N.C.

I agree the first one has no logical explanation except voter fraud but what's the problem with the third one? They only voted in the other state and not in NC. Doesn't that fact pattern fit somebody who lived in NC moving to another state, registering there and voting there? The latest registration and voting happened in their new state of residence, like it should.