New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

philip964
Senior Member
Posts: 18485
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by philip964 »

Hmmm. John Lennon, wasn't he killed in New York City by a loser with a gun who just wanted to be famous. Guns were illegal in NYC then, so how are they going to make them more illegal now.
chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts: 4176
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by chasfm11 »

philip964 wrote:Hmmm. John Lennon, wasn't he killed in New York City by a loser with a gun who just wanted to be famous. Guns were illegal in NYC then, so how are they going to make them more illegal now.
By turning the current legal gun owners into criminals. The Journal News interactive gun owner map's real purpose was to make it easy for the NY State authorities to start confiscation. That is what the governor publicly stated that he wanted.

The good people of NY have the government that that the voted for. I wish them well with ti. Small drinks, no pain killers and no guns. Sounds like a great place to pay high taxes to.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
DocV
Senior Member
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:29 pm

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by DocV »

Dave2 wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:I'll bet you $1,000 that at least one key NY legislator with an "impossible to get carry permit" is carrying a 1911. Bingo, a 7-round limit instead of 6, or 5, or zero.

I hope New Yorkers wake up soon. :banghead:
I thought modern 1911s had 8-round magazines?
Modern 1911s? Whodathunk? "rlol"
I have a couple of eight round 1911 magazines but converted them to seven rounders. I hope this does not mean I have to move to NY.
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by Dave2 »

DocV wrote:
Dave2 wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:I'll bet you $1,000 that at least one key NY legislator with an "impossible to get carry permit" is carrying a 1911. Bingo, a 7-round limit instead of 6, or 5, or zero.

I hope New Yorkers wake up soon. :banghead:
I thought modern 1911s had 8-round magazines?
Modern 1911s? Whodathunk? "rlol"
I have a couple of eight round 1911 magazines but converted them to seven rounders. I hope this does not mean I have to move to NY.
Ok then, modern 1911 magazines.

Seriously, I thought the full-size ones were 8-rounds for flush-fitting and 10-rounds for extended magazines. Am I just thinking of P220 mags?
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
Maxwell
Senior Member
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:05 pm

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by Maxwell »

New York, California, and Illinois can pass all the laws they want. It will not make them a safer or give them less crime until they realize you have to give the criminals an active deterent.
I never let schooling interfere with my education. Mark Twain
ryouiki
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:01 pm

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by ryouiki »

The rumblings are that they just passed this in the NY Senate. Of course based on the below it looks far more dastardly then you might imagine:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/120400946/Cuo ... fact-sheet

Bans > 7 round magazines, only grandfathers 10 rounds or less (but can only be loaded with 7 rounds), rest must be sold out of state within one year (or confiscated). What seems to be worse is an "Assault Weapon" is classified as any pistol/rifle that has one "military" characteristic + detachable magazine.

Without knowing what a "military" characteristic might be, this could basically ban all semi-auto handguns (picatinny rail anyone?)

New York residents just got it good and hard...

*Edit* The actual legislation says for pistols.... folding/thumbhole stock, accepts magazine outside of grip, threaded barrel, any weapon that can be held with non trigger hand without getting burned, weighs more then 50 oz. unloaded, + some additional provisions I'm too lazy to read.

Guess that just made all of the city/state police's sidearms illegal... their intent was to attack "barrel shrouds/the thing that goes up" but the wording makes a Glock an assault weapon.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
grumble
Senior Member
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:40 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by grumble »

Did you hear that sound? It was the sound of 1 million guns "getting lost" in the state's lakes and streams. "Whups, I lost 'em."
Who are my congressmen again? http://www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us
User avatar
grumble
Senior Member
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:40 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by grumble »

It will turn law abiding citizens into criminals simply by doing nothing. Magazines >10 rounds must be "sold out of state" or get confiscated. :banghead:
Who are my congressmen again? http://www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us
Andrew

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by Andrew »

Dave2 wrote:
DocV wrote:
Dave2 wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:I'll bet you $1,000 that at least one key NY legislator with an "impossible to get carry permit" is carrying a 1911. Bingo, a 7-round limit instead of 6, or 5, or zero.

I hope New Yorkers wake up soon. :banghead:
I thought modern 1911s had 8-round magazines?
Modern 1911s? Whodathunk? "rlol"
I have a couple of eight round 1911 magazines but converted them to seven rounders. I hope this does not mean I have to move to NY.
Ok then, modern 1911 magazines.

Seriously, I thought the full-size ones were 8-rounds for flush-fitting and 10-rounds for extended magazines. Am I just thinking of P220 mags?
M1911a1 magazines were designed to be 7 rounds in capacity. The "Modern" or "Custom" magazines with an 8 round capacity have the same dimensions as the 7 round magazines, the changes which allow the 8th round are in the magazine follower and it's spring. The 7 round follower takes up a lot of room in the magazine and by changing the design, manufacturers were able to squeeze in another round. As with any change in design there are un-intended consequences. Basically the early 8 round designs couldn't reliably feed the 8th round(diving, falling off the bolt face, etc.)This was addressed in another round of follower design changes and increasing stronger springs(11 and 12 pounds). I've heard that the new high end 8 rounders perform flawlessly. I just like my old ultra reliable Colt magazines that never fail to perform. Just like me.
User avatar
Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by Beiruty »

This new restriction is no good for our 2nA and when Feds are shut down with their drive for more gun-grabbing laws. NRA would go challenge the new restrictions as unconstitutional.

Man, I do love to live in TX. No matter how many job offers I got, I would never move to CA nor NY. Upper state NYers would hate their new gun laws.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
cubbyjg
Senior Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:07 pm

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by cubbyjg »

grumble wrote:It will turn law abiding citizens into criminals simply by doing nothing. Magazines >10 rounds must be "sold out of state" or get confiscated. :banghead:
This makes me furious. They follow the strict rules and still get bent over.
Hook'em Horns!
Class of 2007

“I am actually for gun control. Use both hands." - Gov. Rick Perry
User avatar
xring
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:23 am
Location: Galveston County

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by xring »

Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
George Washington
Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock.
Will Rogers
User avatar
Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by Jumping Frog »

Gonna' be a lot of used mags for sale on gunbroker. . .
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
User avatar
JJVP
Senior Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by JJVP »

grumble wrote:It will turn law abiding citizens into criminals simply by doing nothing. Magazines >10 rounds must be "sold out of state" or get confiscated. :banghead:
Hey, look at the bright side. You can buy cheap mags from NY residents. They should create a website CheapNYMagsforSale.com

:hurry:
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
User avatar
Jaguar
Senior Member
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: Just west of Cool, Texas

Re: New York Set to Pass New Restrictions

Post by Jaguar »

JJVP wrote:
grumble wrote:It will turn law abiding citizens into criminals simply by doing nothing. Magazines >10 rounds must be "sold out of state" or get confiscated. :banghead:
Hey, look at the bright side. You can buy cheap mags from NY residents. They should create a website CheapNYMagsforSale.com

:hurry:
It has already worked out for me, my carry gun is a Kahr K9, formerly owned by a NY police officer until the department determined they could not have those evil guns that don't have a 15 lbs triggers. It is 100% reliable, a pretty gun (I like pretty things :lol: ) and it was priced very reasonable.

:tiphat: to NYPD.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”