TexasCHLforum.com

jimlongley wrote:
It was also very interesting to note that every time she was asked to respond to one of your points, she went off on a tangent.

This is a technique that we see a lot from politicians and talking heads. Is seems so obvious to me, but I wonder does the average listener notice this?

Liberty wrote:

jimlongley wrote:


It was also very interesting to note that every time she was asked to respond to one of your points, she went off on a tangent.

This is a technique that we see a lot from politicians and talking heads. Is seems so obvious to me, but I wonder does the average listener notice this?

Very well done Charles! What gets me is is usually when I hear some one from the Brady campaign or the like asked to give reasons why guns should be prohibited, banned, etc. the reasons they list just are not logical. The statics they come up make no sense. Charles gave on topic, serious responses and was polite and professional the entire time. Thank you Charles for continuing to represent your fellow law abiding gun owners in a professional manner.

She really didn't seem to have a well thought out argument did she? Other than she didn't agree with it...more of an opinion than a persuasive argument/position. Well done Mr. Cotton