Well when we get around to appointing you King, you can decree who is allowed to carry and who isn't.gdanaher wrote:You could legislate deep concealment but in practice could not possibly guarantee it. Sorry, some folks are just stupid. Yes, some of those teachers, too. Just idiots--and I can guarantee they would do something stupid with their gun, and one kid would be on it like a duck on a junebug. If as a principal if I could cherry pick who could or could not carry, I would feel better. But honestly, I've known folks who had absolutely no business being armed. Some years ago I knew an unarmed night time security guard who deliberately ran over kids in the parking lot. He said he wanted to shoot them, but not having a gun, he chose to run them down with his pov. You should not assume that everyone who is "qualified" to carry, should.

I think allowing teachers with CHLs to carry would be a non issue.
Those who are already defense minded and responsible would carry and be able to protect themselves and their students.
Most teachers won't bother going trough the hassle of a class, paying money, etc. You'll probably wind up with the same percentage of teachers carrying as average population carrying, less than 5%. But that may be enough to dissuade crazy loons from thinking a school is a soft target to make themselves famous.
Heck, if nothing else a simple argument is this: Schools being a gun free zone has obviously worked out so well....maybe its time we try something else.
