TexasCHLforum.com

Wienerdogtroy wrote:

Abraham wrote:Neither and that's the easy answer.

What I hope is he's mentally evaluated.

Found O.K.

Then let go with a harsh warning to never do that or anything like it again or else...

No. Punish him to the fullest extent of the law. He terrorized people with his act. He should pay accordingly.

Obama is terrorizing people by threatening to violate our rights. Maybe they can share a cell.

Wienerdogtroy wrote:

Abraham wrote:Neither and that's the easy answer.

What I hope is he's mentally evaluated.

Found O.K.

Then let go with a harsh warning to never do that or anything like it again or else...

No. Punish him to the fullest extent of the law. He terrorized people with his act. He should pay accordingly.

They didn't seem too terrorized. They didn't call the police until after he had left. I agree he should be punished. Maybe 200 hours of community service or 30 days in county jail. His intent wasn't to terrorize.

AndyC wrote:http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01 ... s-arrested

Officials say Ronald Miller was unarmed Wednesday when he told a school greeter outside Celina Elementary School that he had a gun, according to NBCDFW.com. The town of Celina is just north of Dallas.

The greeter froze in panic when Miller said he was a gunman and his target was inside, Celina Independent School District Superintendent Donny O'Dell told NBCDFW.com. Miller was then able to walk into the school and entered the office.

No, if what the media is reporting is true, then I think it was a very bad idea. Unfortunately, the media reports information incorrectly ALL the time due to not knowing the full story because they want to be the first to report it.

http://twitter.com/CelinaISD/status/289 ... 64/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The school stated, and I qoute, "At no time did we feel that our students at any of our campuses were in harms way."

All I am is saying is get ALL the facts first before you judge. The guy is a public servant, just like me, and we are called to a higher standard. And that standard is not easy to obtain and maintain. We get screened before we go on the job and have a lot of post-incident counseling on the serious stuff. Maybe his method of asking questions was not understood. As a public servant we are taught and train in "scenario based" discussions constantly. We HAVE to play the "what if" games. Maybe he took that approach and the average person may not be able to understand it.

I would like some follow-up on this case, but the media probably won't cover it.