Delaware: Right-to-Carry

Paladin · Post by **Paladin** » Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:03 pm

Looks like there is starting to be a push for shall issue in Delaware. About time.

http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs ... 60319/1109

JLinTX · Post by **JLinTX** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:22 am

+1

now only if NJ / NY would do the same...

bauerdj · Post by **bauerdj** » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:40 am

Don't hold your breath

Dave B. -who is an ex New Yorker and proud of it! (proud of the "EX" part anyway)

Paladin · Post by **Paladin** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:20 am

Some new articles on the latest in DE:

Del. Bill Would Allow Many to Carry Concealed Handguns:

http://www.wboc.com/Global/story.asp?S=4636547&nav=MXEF

http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs ... 60302/1004

The Brady's at it again:

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=62503

stevie_d_64 · Post by **stevie_d_64** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:38 am

Paladin wrote:The Brady's at it again:

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=62503

blood in the streets

yawn...

Kalrog · Post by **Kalrog** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:43 am

stevie_d_64 wrote: blood in the streets blood in the streets blood in the streets blood in the streets

yawn...

Paladin · Post by **Paladin** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:44 am

The more the Brady's spew second rate propaganda, the less respect I have for them... and that article was full of second rate propaganda...

stevie_d_64 · Post by **stevie_d_64** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:53 pm

Kalrog wrote:
stevie_d_64 wrote: blood in the streets blood in the streets blood in the streets blood in the streets

yawn...

That was going to be my next emoticon...But I figured I beat it to death anyway...

stevie_d_64 · Post by **stevie_d_64** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:54 pm

And you know what...

I didn't even read the article yet...(I will I promise Paladin)

I just raise my hands to the screen and pulled it in via osmosis...

stevie_d_64 · Post by **stevie_d_64** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 2:02 pm

In honor of my friend Paladin...This is as far as I could get...Paragraph 2...

"Twenty-five years ago this coming March 30, President Reagan and I were totally surrounded by the world's best-trained law enforcement professionals, yet they were not capable of preventing a man with a concealed handgun from almost killing the President of the United States," said Jim Brady, President Reagan's press secretary at the time, who was also seriously wounded. "Putting a concealed handgun inside the jacket of anyone who doesn't have a felony conviction is reckless public policy."

Hey Jim-boy...Go pound sand...

I bet those "best-trained law enforcement professionals" really appreciate your sentiments...

From what I remember a couple of them did what they were supposed to do and make their bodies a shield and took a few of those bullets for your boss...

Sorry you felt like you had to bust ranks in front of them though...But hindsights 20/20 huh?

longtooth · Post by **longtooth** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:43 pm

I did read the whole thing but I don't know why. That stuff makes my blood preasure go up. I'm going to have to go mow a yard just to calm down. Those two make me even mader than Hinkley did. At least you can put him in jail. My dad, my son, & many of you & yours fight & some die so those fools can have the right to serve that vomit to a tasteless public. This

is no rant only truth that I ask no forgiveness for.

nitrogen · Post by **nitrogen** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:05 pm

Dangit now you've gone and done it. I went to the site.

I read about how the Brady campaign supports the ATF and their illegal Schutzstaffel tactics in Virginia.
*grumble*

As evil as the thought might be, I hope Sarah Brady never has the fear of being stalked by a rapist or mugger, waiting 5-10 mins for the cops to rescue her.

Post by **Charles L. Cotton** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:48 pm

Paladin:
Your attempt to bait me again is not working. I'm exercising better self control . . . I'm exercising better self control . . . I'm exercising better self control . . . I'm exercising better self control . . .

Chas.

rodnocker1 · Post by **rodnocker1** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 7:06 pm

Stevie, maybe I am misreading the last sentence in that paragraph. The way it reads is that the Brady Bunch feel like the only ones who should have a concealed handgun inside their jackets are those who have Felony convictions.

Seems like a strange position to take. Most people (judges included) feel just the opposite...FELONS SHOULD NOT BE ARMED!!!

Shooters wear eye and ear protection to protect themselves from possible hazards at the range. I wonder if the Brady Bunch wears nose plugs so they won't get sick from the smell of what they are shoveling?

longtooth · Post by **longtooth** » Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:17 pm

+ 1 on your last line rod.

TexasCHLforum.com

Delaware: Right-to-Carry

Delaware: Right-to-Carry

Re: Delaware: Right-to-Carry