US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

surprise_i'm_armed
Senior Member
Posts: 4622
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:16 am
Location: Shady Shores, Denton County. On the shores of Lake Lewisville. John Wayne filmed here.

US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by surprise_i'm_armed »

The model 1911 is well-loved by military and civilians alike.

Why did the US military feel that they had to have a replacement for the 1911?

Trading down in caliber from .45 to a 9mm seems counter-intuitive for battle use.

Is the Beretta M9 the proper sidearm for our troops? Has it performed well?

Don't special forces still prefer 1911's?

Anyone familiar with this government move in year 19nn?

SIA
N. Texas LTC's hold 3 breakfasts each month. All are 800 AM. OC is fine.
2nd Saturdays: Rudy's BBQ, N. Dallas Pkwy, N.bound, N. of Main St., Frisco.
3rd Saturdays: Golden Corral, 465 E. I-20, Collins St exit, Arlington.
4th Saturdays: Sunny St. Cafe, off I-20, Exit 415, Mikus Rd, Willow Park.
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by Keith B »

The JSSAP was the reason http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Serv ... ms_Program" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
surprise_i'm_armed
Senior Member
Posts: 4622
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:16 am
Location: Shady Shores, Denton County. On the shores of Lake Lewisville. John Wayne filmed here.

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by surprise_i'm_armed »

Keith B:
Thanks for the link. It doesn't seem to state WHY the military felt they needed
to go with a 9.

I wonder if the Sig P228 emerged from this testing to become a standard weapon
for some Federal LEO's.

SIA
N. Texas LTC's hold 3 breakfasts each month. All are 800 AM. OC is fine.
2nd Saturdays: Rudy's BBQ, N. Dallas Pkwy, N.bound, N. of Main St., Frisco.
3rd Saturdays: Golden Corral, 465 E. I-20, Collins St exit, Arlington.
4th Saturdays: Sunny St. Cafe, off I-20, Exit 415, Mikus Rd, Willow Park.
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by Keith B »

I think a big part was the 9mm is a NATO round. They were also looking for a weapon with a higher round capacity. The Beretta is a little lighter too, 34oz vs the 1911 at 39oz.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
surprise_i'm_armed
Senior Member
Posts: 4622
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:16 am
Location: Shady Shores, Denton County. On the shores of Lake Lewisville. John Wayne filmed here.

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by surprise_i'm_armed »

"9mm's were invented by Europeans to annoy their neighbors."
Author unknown.

IIRC, NATO doesn't even have fully integrated radio equipment, but the US
decided that our ammo needed to match theirs?

Do you think the M9 has been a quality sidearm?
Other Beretta owners here on the forum seem to like theirs, except for the
large size hindering concealability.

SIA
N. Texas LTC's hold 3 breakfasts each month. All are 800 AM. OC is fine.
2nd Saturdays: Rudy's BBQ, N. Dallas Pkwy, N.bound, N. of Main St., Frisco.
3rd Saturdays: Golden Corral, 465 E. I-20, Collins St exit, Arlington.
4th Saturdays: Sunny St. Cafe, off I-20, Exit 415, Mikus Rd, Willow Park.
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by AEA »

Yup, that NATO thing.....long before it was fashion with our current President! Wonder if he can figur out a way to claim that he made that happen too? Oh wait, Biden should be able to do that.......
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by Oldgringo »

I had a Beretta 92 FS (M9) and it was great to shoot and maintain. OTOH, it was about like a football cleat under my shirt. I wish I had it back???
DONT TREAD ON ME

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by DONT TREAD ON ME »

surprise_i'm_armed wrote:"the US
decided that our ammo needed to match theirs?



SIA
Along with the 9mm being a NATO round the 92 has a higher mag capacity (I personally do not like it and wish we would have stuck to the 1911 as it is 45 and IMO a much better gun...no offense to 92 users, just my opinion).

We use NATO rounds so that when we fight along side other NATO countries we can swap out ammo easily in the heat of battle. This is why we use the 5.56 for our M16/M4 instead of the 7.62 that the AK47 uses, even though the 7.62 is a larger round and is what our enemies use in Iraq and Afghanistan.

:patriot:
User avatar
pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by pbwalker »

I like the M9 when I was in. If I had known about the 1911 (I didn't really know much about handguns back when I was 18), I probably would have still picked the M9 just for capacity. Knowing what I know now (about calibers, etc.), I'd want the 1911.

I still like the M9 and really want to pick one up when the funds allow it.
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
User avatar
MoJo
Senior Member
Posts: 4899
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:10 pm
Location: Vidor, Tx
Contact:

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by MoJo »

It had to do with NATO standardization every army in NATO except the U.S. was using the 9mm as a handgun/sub machine-gun round. The U.S. military was wanting a double action pistol because the average soldier couldn't be trusted with cocked and locked carry. Conversion systems were tried and failed, a number of other guns were tested Ruger and S&W were two that fared well. Even though it wasn't the first choice, the Beretta was selected. Most of the guys I've talked to that have used the M9 don't like it.

When I was in the Army (1967-'70) lots of GIs didn't like the 1911 because it was "too big, too hard to shoot, kicked too much, wasn't accurate, and jammed."

About the only thing a GI approves of is free cold beer. :cheers2:

The first NATO rifle round was the 7.62 NATO (.308 Win) then came the 5.56 both were American designed rounds so I guess one European round is allowed to be adopted.
"To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Texas and Louisiana CHL Instructor, NRA Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection and Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor
srothstein
Senior Member
Posts: 5317
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by srothstein »

I was told when I was in (1975-1983) that the NATO treaty required any new weapon systems adopted by the member nations to be of NATO caliber. Back then we knew that the days of the 1911 were numbered. I know the Army in the mid-80's was looking at trying to get a better weapon system for pistols that would reduce the logistic and training problems. Just in my MP unit, we had 1911 for the male MP's, S&W Model 10 .38 spl for the female MP's, and Colt 2 in barrel revolvers (.38 spl) for the undercover/plain clothes agents. I know there were several other different make, model, and style weapons in use by various types of units. Even though the 1911 is generally thought of as the "issue" pistol of the time, there were many different ones.

It makes sense to have just one pistol or pistol family to support. Having the common ammo with our allies also makes some sense. So we all knew it would be a 9mm and that it was just a matter of time until the switch.
Steve Rothstein
YabuUS

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by YabuUS »

I thought I read somewhere (and I can't remember exactly where) that the military, or a portion of it at least, had decided to go back to the 1911. Can anyone confirm that?
User avatar
LostInAustin
Senior Member
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:38 pm
Location: Austin, Republic of Texas
Contact:

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by LostInAustin »

I like my 92FS...Great for paper punching! :clapping:

I like my 1911's...Great for putting holes in BG's! :shock:

:mrgreen: :smilelol5: "rlol" :evil2:

Just kidding guys....I like them both! :thumbs2:
Colt Combat Commander
Colt Govt Model Series 70
Beretta 92FS
tboesche
Senior Member
Posts: 582
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: US Military replaced the 1911 with M9 Beretta. Why?

Post by tboesche »

Hated the M9. Long trigger pull and uncomfortable in my hand. It was a sad day when I had to stop carrying my 1911.

But now I carry a 1911 everyday! :fire
"Water's, wet, The sky is blue. And old Satan Claws, He's out there, and he's just getting stronger." Joe Halenbeck
"So what do we do about it?" Jimmie Dix
"Be prepared, Junior, That's my motto, Be Prepared". Joe Halenbeck
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”