Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
A-R
Senior Member
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by A-R »

Two good letters (neither written by me) were printed in Austin Statesman this week, rebutting their typically slanted profile story of the scary-evil-cop-killer FN FiveseveN semi-automatic pistol (semi-auto, of course meaning that it selects its own targets, aims, and fires itself :banghead: ).

http://www.statesman.com/opinion/conten ... _edit.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Put the blame where it belongs

There are many ways to commit terrorist acts. Not a day goes by we don't hear of a bombing or other act of terrorism. It is unjust for Mike Ward to attempt to vilify the merchant that sold the handgun to the alleged Fort Hood shooter.

If Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan had decided to put a bomb in his briefcase instead, would Ward have attempted to vilify Virginia Tech for teaching Hasan chemistry?

Let's put the blame where it belongs, not on the merchant or the gun, but on the man that committed the act.

The Army was aware of this man's radical views but did nothing, apparently paralyzed by political correctness.

Thomas Palmer
Austin
Criminals make weapons deadly
I knew from the start of the Statesman's Nov. 7 article "Pistol linked to attack called powerful, concealable" that it would be sensationalized and full of anti-gun propaganda. There is not enough room here to?argue the distortions, so the point of this letter is to question why the article was printed.

There have been incidents where people have deliberately committed murder using a motor vehicle. There is a crime called vehicular assault, which justifies use of deadly force in self-defense.

Why have we never seen a sidebar about the vehicle? Why don't we have information about horsepower,?registration, insurance or inspection? Where did the criminal buy the car? Why don't we interview the shady, plaid-wearing, used car salesman that helped?with the commission of this crime?

The answer is because it doesn't matter.

The criminal committed the crime, not the weapon.

David D. Haun
Round Rock
The letters are rebutting this article (a typical media firearms hack job) from the Statesman's extensive coverage of the Fort Hood massacre ...

http://www.statesman.com/search/content ... 07gun.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
FORT HOOD SHOOTING

Pistol linked to attack called powerful, concealable
5.7mm handgun called 'an assault rifle that fits in your pocket.'

By Mike Ward
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Saturday, November 07, 2009

A 5.7-millimeter pistol identified Friday as the weapon used in the Fort Hood shooting rampage is a type dubbed "an assault rifle that fits in your pocket" and is known for its ability to pierce body armor and for its growing use by Mexican drug cartels. One military expert said it was a weapon that no doctor — not even a military one — would normally carry.

Published reports quoting law enforcement officials and official records said an FN 5.7 allegedly used by Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, identified by military authorities as the suspect in Thursday's attack, was purchased at Guns Galore in Killeen weeks and perhaps months earlier.

The store's Web site says it has been in business since 1999, stocking more than 3,000 firearms "for all hunting, recreational and gun collectors needs."

A call to the store Friday went unanswered.

But Austin gun store employees said the weapon could have been easily purchased — by passing a background check with a three-day waiting period required by federal law.

They said a soldier with no criminal history would have had little problem buying such a pistol. Because handgun-

permit records in Texas are not public, Department of Public Safety officials said they could not say whether Hasan had a concealed-carry license.

Manufactured by the Belgium-based FN Herstal, the FN FiveSeveN pistol was heavily criticized when it was introduced in the United States about five years ago because it was designed to fire bullets through body armor. Critics sought to block its sale.

The weapon is lightweight and easily concealed, and it is designed as a military sidearm to complement military rifles made by the same company, according to Web reviews of the weapon.

According to the company Web site, it has an ammunition magazine capacity of 20 rounds and a "NATO-recommended caliber," meaning it takes ammunition compatible with that used by militaries in the alliance.

Though the type of ammunition used in Thursday's attack was not immediately known, investigators and news reports confirmed that the most powerful type of ammunition for the FN 5.7 is available only to law enforcement and military personnel. Budd Hallberg, a retired Army lieutenant colonel with 31 years of military service, said an unanswered question is why Hasan would have had such a weapon.

"It's a weapon to be used in combat," said Hallberg, a former infantry officer who lives in Gettysburg, Pa., expressing shock and sadness at the tragedy. "What in the hell would a doctor have it for?"

According to the Brady Campaign handgun-control group, some Washington lawmakers sought a ban on civilian possession of the pistol amid warnings from police organizations that it "represented a unique threat to the safety of police officers."

"An assault rifle that fits in your pocket" is how one law enforcement official described the pistol in earlier Congressional testimony.

When first introduced for civilian sales, according to the Brady Campaign, the FN Web site touted that "enemy personnel, even wearing body armor can be effectively engaged up to 200 meters. Kevlar helmets and vests ... will be penetrated."

The company's Web site contained no such claims Friday.

mward@statesman.com

Editor's Note: We have disabled commenting on this story because of repeated abuse of our commenting policy related to the Ft. Hood shooting.
User avatar
A-R
Senior Member
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by A-R »

By the way, this "Gun Galore" store that allegedly sold the gun to the alleged Fort Hood shooter looks like a decent place from its web site http://www.gunsgalore.net/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... anyone been there? I might have to run up there some day to do a little shopping and show my support for the store's owners.

:patriot: :txflag:
User avatar
joe817
Senior Member
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by joe817 »

The link posted is in Finton, MI. I thought he bought the FN in Killeen? :headscratch Different company perhaps?

But that's a HUGE gun store to be sure! :shock:
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
User avatar
Mithras61
Senior Member
Posts: 913
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:43 pm
Location: Somewhere in Texas

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by Mithras61 »

joe817 wrote:The link posted is in Finton, MI. I thought he bought the FN in Killeen? :headscratch Different company perhaps?

But that's a HUGE gun store to be sure! :shock:
You are correct that the link is not to Guns Galore in Killeen. The correct link is http://www.gunsgalorellc.com/.
User avatar
ammo two
Member
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:14 pm
Location: Central Texas
Contact:

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by ammo two »

austinrealtor wrote:By the way, this "Gun Galore" store that allegedly sold the gun to the alleged Fort Hood shooter looks like a decent place from its web site http://www.gunsgalore.net/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... anyone been there? I might have to run up there some day to do a little shopping and show my support for the store's owners.

:patriot: :txflag:
Yes, I have been in there several times. They do have quite the selection. Good people there too, employees have always been more than helpful. Hopefully they are able to survive any storm that this may be blowing their direction.
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by Purplehood »

3-day waiting period?
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar
A-R
Senior Member
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by A-R »

Mithras61 wrote:
joe817 wrote:The link posted is in Finton, MI. I thought he bought the FN in Killeen? :headscratch Different company perhaps?

But that's a HUGE gun store to be sure! :shock:
You are correct that the link is not to Guns Galore in Killeen. The correct link is http://www.gunsgalorellc.com/.
nice catch, fellas. i didn't even notice that. couldn't take my eyes off all those photos of rows and rows of long guns :drool:
User avatar
joe817
Senior Member
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by joe817 »

couldn't take my eyes off all those photos of rows and rows of long guns
Me neither! We've got something close to that up in Ft.Worth, but not as big.
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
mctowalot
Senior Member
Posts: 632
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:13 am
Location: Houston

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by mctowalot »

Beware the "shady, plaid wearing used car salesman"! :reddevil
Better ban 'em before somebody gets hurt.
User avatar
joe817
Senior Member
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by joe817 »

mctowalot wrote:Beware the "shady, plaid wearing used car salesman"! :reddevil
Better ban 'em before somebody gets hurt.
You left out tan polyester sans a belt pants and black patent leather buckle shoes. "rlol" :biggrinjester:
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
Pete92FS
Senior Member
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Houston

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by Pete92FS »

Purplehood wrote:3-day waiting period?
I wondered about that comment also. Another idiot reporter that can't get their facts straight. :grumble
CHL since 01/26/09
mctowalot
Senior Member
Posts: 632
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:13 am
Location: Houston

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by mctowalot »

I think it was May West who asked, "Is that an assault rifle in your pocket or...(deleted punchline 'cause I don't want to get kicked off the board) " :anamatedbanana
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by Purplehood »

If that is such a nasty firearm, why were there almost 3 times as many wounded as killed?

4 rounds in that little lady that shot him? And she is alive? Sounds like any old pistol to me.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
dihappy
Senior Member
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by dihappy »

Jeez! I cant believe the Statesman doesnt review this stuff before it goes out :(

Heck, maybe they do but dont care.
Image
User avatar
Fangs
Senior Member
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: San Marcos, TX

Re: Rebuttals to media slant on Fort Hood firearm

Post by Fangs »

When first introduced for civilian sales, according to the Brady Campaign, the FN Web site touted that "enemy personnel, even wearing body armor can be effectively engaged up to 200 meters.
Effective at 200 meters? Is it scoped? :confused5
"When I was a kid, people who did wrong were punished, restricted, and forbidden. Now, when someone does wrong, all of the rest of us are punished, restricted, and forbidden. The one who did the wrong is counselled and "understood" and fed ice cream." - speedsix
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”