Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
Holder wants more innocent people to die. Nothing to see. Move along.
If you think health care is expensive now, wait until it's free.
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
Found this article about Senator Lautenberg's bill:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7ab_1253999828" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Status of both bills in Thomas:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7ab_1253999828" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Status of both bills in Thomas:
andS.1317
Title: A bill to increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of firearms or the issuance of firearms and explosives licenses to known or suspected dangerous terrorists.
Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 6/22/2009) Cosponsors (2)
Related Bills: H.R.2159
Latest Major Action: 6/22/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALL ACTIONS:
6/22/2009:
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Before either of these gains any traction, we'll hear about it from the NRA and TSRA.H.R.2159
Title: To increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of a firearm or the issuance of firearms or explosives licenses to a known or suspected dangerous terrorist.
Sponsor: Rep King, Peter T. [NY-3] (introduced 4/29/2009) Cosponsors (12)
Related Bills: S.1317
Latest Major Action: 6/12/2009 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALL ACTIONS:
4/29/2009:
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
6/12/2009:
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
Eric Holder is a Rook in the current administration's silent assault on the Second Amendment.AndyC wrote:After explaining and defending his decision to give enemy combatants constitutional protections and the right to public trial in civilian courts, Attorney General Holder revealed his support for a national gun owner registration scheme and authorizing the government to ban firearm possession for any person by merely adding that person's name to the terror watch list.
I was extremely pleased to see him roasted over a hot grill these past few days.

Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
I was thinking Pawn instead of Rook. The decision to move the trial to NYC instead of Guantanamo and make it a criminal trial instead of a military trial, is not a decision the AG is authorized to make alone. He had to have a knod from BHO to do that. Then Barry says that he wasn't involved in the decision to move the venue, etc??? Please!!!!Skiprr wrote:Eric Holder is a Rook in the current administration's silent assault on the Second Amendment.
I was extremely pleased to see him roasted over a hot grill these past few days.

Eric Holder is just as dangerous as Barry. If this trial gets moved to a criminal court without KSM being read his Miranda Rights, doesn't all the evidence that was gathered for a military trial become inadmissive? Plus, KSM gets all the rights and priveledges of an American citizen?? This whole thing has me spitting nails. And now, Holder is backing a gun registration program?? Where does the insanity end? Can we wait until 2010 to crack the whip?
Nov. 2010...Check!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
- UpTheIrons
- Senior Member
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:55 pm
- Location: Seguin, Texas
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
As bad as Lindsey Graham can be on some things, he just nails AG Holder's hide to the wall here:pdubyoo wrote:Eric Holder is just as dangerous as Barry. If this trial gets moved to a criminal court without KSM being read his Miranda Rights, doesn't all the evidence that was gathered for a military trial become inadmissive? Plus, KSM gets all the rights and priveledges of an American citizen?? This whole thing has me spitting nails. And now, Holder is backing a gun registration program?? Where does the insanity end? Can we wait until 2010 to crack the whip?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG7lm8Sfbo4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This is the real problem. We catch bin Laden tomorrow, and all of a sudden he's shipped to the Feds so they can Mirandize him and let him be silent. No interrogation allowed. Wonderful.


"I don't know how that would ever be useful, but I want two!"
Springs are cheap - your gun and your life aren't.
Springs are cheap - your gun and your life aren't.
- Purplehood
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
The sad thing is that something like this does have the potential to worm its way through the system. The precedence was set by the Patriot Act with its equal abuse of the term "due process".
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
- stevie_d_64
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
It's been in the wings since the get go...It only needed a good crisis like this to get traction...Rahm Emanuel has been quoted as saying, "Never waste a good crisis."AndyC wrote:You guys heard anything about this?
So I am not surprised...
There are so many other things that are going to put at risk our right to keep and bear arms, that most of these revelations are going to be used as smoke screens to hide the more drastic moves that will be made after 8pm EST tomorrow night...
I'll let y'all figure out what that is...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
- stevie_d_64
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
Well, birds get sucked up into jet engines ALL the time...The odds are incredible...And OBL can always get that parachute packed with someones laundry...By mistake of course...UpTheIrons wrote:As bad as Lindsey Graham can be on some things, he just nails AG Holder's hide to the wall here:pdubyoo wrote:Eric Holder is just as dangerous as Barry. If this trial gets moved to a criminal court without KSM being read his Miranda Rights, doesn't all the evidence that was gathered for a military trial become inadmissive? Plus, KSM gets all the rights and priveledges of an American citizen?? This whole thing has me spitting nails. And now, Holder is backing a gun registration program?? Where does the insanity end? Can we wait until 2010 to crack the whip?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG7lm8Sfbo4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This is the real problem. We catch bin Laden tomorrow, and all of a sudden he's shipped to the Feds so they can Mirandize him and let him be silent. No interrogation allowed. Wonderful.![]()
Same thing can happen to KSM, and the rest of the goobers coming to NYC...
Man, that would be a shame wouldn't it???
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
It's possible the President has a repressed desire to see those guys get off light or even walk due to his Islamic background.doesn't all the evidence that was gathered for a military trial become inadmissive
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
I cannot believe that the people of the United States (including all the nut cases) would allow terrorist Muslims that killed over 3000 people to "walk" or even get a "light" sentence.
If they do,.......it will be time for me to find another place to live.
If they do,.......it will be time for me to find another place to live.
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
Now THAT would be a treasonous act. I would expect impeachment proceedings to start immediately.casingpoint wrote:It's possible the President has a repressed desire to see those guys get off light or even walk due to his Islamic background.doesn't all the evidence that was gathered for a military trial become inadmissive

Nov. 2010...Check!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
- 03Lightningrocks
- Senior Member
- Posts: 11460
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Plano
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
Yep...your right! This is all Bushes fault too. Good lord, when will the finger pointing ever end???? I guess as long as Oduma is in office?Purplehood wrote:The sad thing is that something like this does have the potential to worm its way through the system. The precedence was set by the Patriot Act with its equal abuse of the term "due process".
NRA-Endowment Member
http://www.planoair.com
http://www.planoairconditioningandheating.com
http://www.planoair.com
http://www.planoairconditioningandheating.com
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
Why does finger-pointing mean partisanship?03Lightningrocks wrote:Yep...your right! This is all Bushes fault too. Good lord, when will the finger pointing ever end???? I guess as long as Oduma is in office?Purplehood wrote:The sad thing is that something like this does have the potential to worm its way through the system. The precedence was set by the Patriot Act with its equal abuse of the term "due process".
There are plenty of fingers to point at Obama, at GWB, at Clinton, at GHWB, on backwards through history. I think the abuse of federal power was President George Washington using armed troops to put down the Whiskey Rebellion. The problem with government is that it doesn't like to be constrained to its constitutional bounds. That's why Jefferson advocated a revolution every generation.
Re: Holder Reveals Aggressive Gun Control In Response to Ft Hood
AndyC wrote:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases ... 35237.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;After explaining and defending his decision to give enemy combatants constitutional protections and the right to public trial in civilian courts, Attorney General Holder revealed his support for a national gun owner registration scheme and authorizing the government to ban firearm possession for any person by merely adding that person's name to the terror watch list.
You guys heard anything about this?
It's as expected. The anti-gun lobby is trying to use the Ft Hood event as a basis for establishing more control on guns. The thing is that the Ft Hood shooter wasn't ON a terrorist watch list,so how would enacting this kind of legislation have any effect on gun ownership by potential terrorist. Further, if the person was in fact a terrorist, the very nature of being a terrorist would probably obviate the disregard for *laws* regarding gun ownership, so making the law would be absurd in that respect.
These people have oatmeal for brains.
Took class, paid fees, changed my mind. I want constitutional carry.