How STUPID is STUPID?

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by Oldgringo »

All,

We got a letter yesterday from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE telling us that we're fixin' to get a letter from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE concerning the 2010 census.

How much do these letters cost? No wonder the U.S. is teeterin' on bankruptcy! I say fire all 545 of 'em, abolish Civil Service and let's start over. Good grief! :banghead:

Best,

Greg
User avatar
shortysboy09
Senior Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:51 am
Location: Mckinney, Tx.

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by shortysboy09 »

Oldgringo wrote:All,

We got a letter yesterday from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE telling us that we're fixin' to get a letter from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE concerning the 2010 census.

How much do these letters cost? No wonder the U.S. is teeterin' on bankruptcy! I say fire all 545 of 'em, abolish Civil Service and let's start over. Good grief! :banghead:

Best,

Greg
WOW!

I don't see that as really being necessary... :headscratch :crazy:
Disclaimer for all my posts: IANAL

My setup:

Kimber Ultra Crimson Carry II or Bersa Thunder .380
Crossbreed Supertuck

NRA Member
TSRA Member
User avatar
pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by pbwalker »

I'm looking forward to receiving our census form, only answering the questions legally required of me, and watching the census bureau try to intimidate me to answer the rest...

:thumbs2:
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
O6nop
Senior Member
Posts: 680
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Austin

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by O6nop »

shortysboy09 wrote:
Oldgringo wrote:All,

We got a letter yesterday from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE telling us that we're fixin' to get a letter from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE concerning the 2010 census.

How much do these letters cost? No wonder the U.S. is teeterin' on bankruptcy! I say fire all 545 of 'em, abolish Civil Service and let's start over. Good grief! :banghead:

Best,

Greg
WOW!

I don't see that as really being necessary... :headscratch :crazy:
Which part? The part where they send two letters or the part where they should fire all of Congress...?
I believe there is safety in numbers..
numbers like: 9, .22, .38, .357, .45, .223, 5.56, 7.62, 6.5, .30-06...
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by Keith B »

Oldgringo wrote:All,

We got a letter yesterday from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE telling us that we're fixin' to get a letter from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE concerning the 2010 census.

How much do these letters cost? No wonder the U.S. is teeterin' on bankruptcy! I say fire all 545 of 'em, abolish Civil Service and let's start over. Good grief! :banghead:

Best,

Greg
Once you get the letter that the letter told you about, watch for the letter asking if you got the letter that the original letter told you you would get. :mrgreen:
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by sjfcontrol »

pbwalker wrote:I'm looking forward to receiving our census form, only answering the questions legally required of me, and watching the census bureau try to intimidate me to answer the rest...

:thumbs2:
What questions would that be?

Seems to me that they are constitutionally mandated to "enumerate" the population. That means "count". So the entire census consists of the answer: "Two people live in this house"? Sounds good to me! :rules:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar
pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by pbwalker »

sjfcontrol wrote:
pbwalker wrote:I'm looking forward to receiving our census form, only answering the questions legally required of me, and watching the census bureau try to intimidate me to answer the rest...

:thumbs2:
What questions would that be?

Seems to me that they are constitutionally mandated to "enumerate" the population. That means "count". So the entire census consists of the answer: "Two people live in this house"? Sounds good to me! :rules:
:iagree:

And those are the only questions I am going to answer.

What role does race play in the census? I thought we were all equal? I'll pick "Other" and write in American.

A lot of it depends on whether or not you receive the long form too (they are still doing them as far as I know) and if you have to answer the ACS survey.

Sure, many of the questions seem harmless and they likely are. But they are not constitutionally required. They will only get what is constitutionally required from me. I will not give in to the erosion of rights...

/tinfoil hattery "rlol"
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
User avatar
Kythas
Senior Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:06 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by Kythas »

You are required by law to answer all questions asked on the census forms. Failure to answer all questions has a penalty of a $100 fine. Failure to answer all questions truthfully carries a $500 fine penalty.
13 USC Sec. 221

TITLE 13 - CENSUS

CHAPTER 7 - OFFENSES AND PENALTIES

SUBCHAPTER II - OTHER PERSONS

Sec. 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers

(a) Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I, II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not more than $100.

(b) Whoever, when answering questions described in subsection (a) of this section, and under the conditions or circumstances described in such subsection, willfully gives any answer that is false, shall be fined not more than $500.
“I’m all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let’s start with typewriters.” - Frank Lloyd Wright

"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms" - Aristotle
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by sjfcontrol »

Kythas wrote:You are required by law to answer all questions asked on the census forms. Failure to answer all questions has a penalty of a $100 fine. Failure to answer all questions truthfully carries a $500 fine penalty.
13 USC Sec. 221

TITLE 13 - CENSUS

CHAPTER 7 - OFFENSES AND PENALTIES

SUBCHAPTER II - OTHER PERSONS

Sec. 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers

(a) Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I, II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not more than $100.

(b) Whoever, when answering questions described in subsection (a) of this section, and under the conditions or circumstances described in such subsection, willfully gives any answer that is false, shall be fined not more than $500.

Wow! would that be a WHOLE $100? Might be worth it... (Or do they then come back and ask you again and again, causing multiple fines?)

Anyway, it stinks! :mad5
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar
shortysboy09
Senior Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:51 am
Location: Mckinney, Tx.

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by shortysboy09 »

O6nop wrote:
shortysboy09 wrote:
Oldgringo wrote:All,

We got a letter yesterday from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE telling us that we're fixin' to get a letter from the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of COMMERCE concerning the 2010 census.

How much do these letters cost? No wonder the U.S. is teeterin' on bankruptcy! I say fire all 545 of 'em, abolish Civil Service and let's start over. Good grief! :banghead:

Best,

Greg
WOW!

I don't see that as really being necessary... :headscratch :crazy:
Which part? The part where they send two letters or the part where they should fire all of Congress...?
The letter... Congress needs to be booted.
Disclaimer for all my posts: IANAL

My setup:

Kimber Ultra Crimson Carry II or Bersa Thunder .380
Crossbreed Supertuck

NRA Member
TSRA Member
User avatar
pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by pbwalker »

Kythas wrote:You are required by law to answer all questions asked on the census forms. Failure to answer all questions has a penalty of a $100 fine. Failure to answer all questions truthfully carries a $500 fine penalty.
13 USC Sec. 221

TITLE 13 - CENSUS

CHAPTER 7 - OFFENSES AND PENALTIES

SUBCHAPTER II - OTHER PERSONS

Sec. 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers

(a) Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I, II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not more than $100.

(b) Whoever, when answering questions described in subsection (a) of this section, and under the conditions or circumstances described in such subsection, willfully gives any answer that is false, shall be fined not more than $500.
Take a look at the 2000 Census Long Form: http://www.grpundit.com/wp-content/uplo ... s-long.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (I haven't seen the 2010 Long Form yet). You want to answer all of that?

Do you think this is what the founding fathers had in mind when they wrote Article 1 Section 2? The point of the census is to count, use the information to determine representation, and that's primarily it (as far as I understand the original reasoning for the census).

As far as I am concerned, this is no different than the slow erosion of gun rights. Take a little at a time and no one will notice until it is too late. Same applies here. It started as a count and now they want to delve in to personal information? No thanks.

And from what I have read, the last person to get pinged for the $100 fine was 1973. $100 is worth it to me. If the Census Bureau wants to send their goons to intimidate me, they can.

Other than the constitutionally mandated first question (How many people live here?) the rest is an illegal data mining operation.

My $0.02

ETA: If the goons show up at your home, hand them this and ask them to fill out the last page. See what the reaction is...
http://billstclair.com/blog/images/publ ... nnaire.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
User avatar
Kythas
Senior Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:06 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by Kythas »

pbwalker wrote:
Kythas wrote:You are required by law to answer all questions asked on the census forms. Failure to answer all questions has a penalty of a $100 fine. Failure to answer all questions truthfully carries a $500 fine penalty.
13 USC Sec. 221

TITLE 13 - CENSUS

CHAPTER 7 - OFFENSES AND PENALTIES

SUBCHAPTER II - OTHER PERSONS

Sec. 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers

(a) Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I, II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not more than $100.

(b) Whoever, when answering questions described in subsection (a) of this section, and under the conditions or circumstances described in such subsection, willfully gives any answer that is false, shall be fined not more than $500.
Take a look at the 2000 Census Long Form: http://www.grpundit.com/wp-content/uplo ... s-long.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (I haven't seen the 2010 Long Form yet). You want to answer all of that?

Do you think this is what the founding fathers had in mind when they wrote Article 1 Section 2? The point of the census is to count, use the information to determine representation, and that's primarily it (as far as I understand the original reasoning for the census).

As far as I am concerned, this is no different than the slow erosion of gun rights. Take a little at a time and no one will notice until it is too late. Same applies here. It started as a count and now they want to delve in to personal information? No thanks.

And from what I have read, the last person to get pinged for the $100 fine was 1973. $100 is worth it to me. If the Census Bureau wants to send their goons to intimidate me, they can.

Other than the constitutionally mandated first question (How many people live here?) the rest is an illegal data mining operation.

My $0.02
I thought the question was regarding "answering the questions only legally required of me to answer". According to 13 USC Sec 221, we are legally required to answer all questions on the form. That's all I was answering.

Whether this law is unconstitutional is another question, and unless a case comes before SCOTUS whereby they declare all questions other than the number of people living in your household unconstitutional and void, the law stands as is, and we are legally required to answer all questions asked.
“I’m all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let’s start with typewriters.” - Frank Lloyd Wright

"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms" - Aristotle
User avatar
pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by pbwalker »

Kythas wrote: I thought the question was regarding "answering the questions only legally required of me to answer". According to 13 USC Sec 221, we are legally required to answer all questions on the form. That's all I was answering.

Whether this law is unconstitutional is another question, and unless a case comes before SCOTUS whereby they declare all questions other than the number of people living in your household unconstitutional and void, the law stands as is, and we are legally required to answer all questions asked.
You're right, and I apologize if I seem argumentative about this topic...it's just something that's got me a little hot under the collar right now. :tiphat:

The standpoint I am coming from is more of a constitutional perspective and I should have specified that...

But if I've got to pay $100 to make a point, I'll give them $200 so they can hear it twice! "rlol"
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
Mack
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:11 pm
Location: North DFW

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by Mack »

I do not want to start a heated debate about this as I can see that all of you have very strong opinions on this matter. But just to throw another perspective out there. I am a genealogist and I use the pulished censuses a great deal. They are a very valuable resource to tracing your family tree. The census are not released to the public for 70 years so the 1940 census will be release in 2012. When it becomes available I will be one of the first to search in it for my parents who were born in the 1930s. The census from 1790 to 1840 only contained the name of the head of household and the number of people living there roughly grouped by ages, under 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 20 and so forth. Starting in 1850 they enumerated every person living in the household and how they were related to the head of household. They then became very useful for tracing your family tree. Now I fully understand your points about an invasion of privacy but in 100 years when you great great grandchildren are searching for you then this census will be one way of finding you and your relationship to them. So from my point of view I will answer the questions as best I can. Thanks for reading another opinion on the matter.
Sig Sauer P239
gemini
Senior Member
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:01 pm

Re: How STUPID is STUPID?

Post by gemini »

pbwalker:http://billstclair.com/blog/images/publ ... nnaire.pdf

Thanks. Interesting read, and I may have to print off a few copies.

As far as genealogy. Census asks for TOO much info. Much more than what
a genealogist would require to trace basic family tree info.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”