His bike is totaled though.
What's really bothering me is that the officer who responded told him it was his fault, and it looks like his insurance is pegging it on him too. This is where all you older and wiser guys come in.
I made a picture to help explain the situation, and no one is denying that this is how it happened (My brother, the lady who hit him, and a witness all have the same story). He was told it's his fault because "she couldn't see him".

...and I may very well be wrong, but it just doesn't seem like it to me. Anyway, here's the narrative followed by the pic:
My brother was on a main road following behind another car. The car slowed and turned left, and as my brother continued on his way a lady turned to her left from the oncoming lane and squished him under her suburban. See below, the dotted lines show intended paths:

Am I the only one who thinks she's at fault? Since when is, "I didn't see him there" a valid excuse? Since when does turning in front of someone make it their fault? If I am wrong, can someone at least explain why?
I don't get upset often, but this has me pretty
