Lt. Bill Hedgpeth says the gunman went to the apartment and wanted to join the game. But soon after, he pulled a gun and demanded money from the players.
Police have not yet identified the gunman, but say the poker players did not know him.
"There is but one correct answer...and it is best delivered with a Winchester rifle."
I wonder what was going through Johnson's mind? Did he hesitate because he was afraid of being charged with a crime? Or did he think the situation would de-escalate somehow and deadly force would not be required? Had he pulled his gun immediately and shot the BG, his friend might still be alive. This makes me think that when you're confronted with an armed BG you should not hesitate in the hope that things will somehow work out. Thoughts?
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
baldeagle wrote:I wonder what was going through Johnson's mind? Did he hesitate because he was afraid of being charged with a crime? Or did he think the situation would de-escalate somehow and deadly force would not be required? Had he pulled his gun immediately and shot the BG, his friend might still be alive. This makes me think that when you're confronted with an armed BG you should not hesitate in the hope that things will somehow work out. Thoughts?
I agree.
If a man ever points a gun at me, he had better use it, otherwise he will never point it at any one else.
Johnson acted a little too late for his friend but he did save the taxpayers money to prosecute the scum bag.
God Bless America, and please hurry. When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
The way the article reads, the friend jumped on the intruder and struggled to get the gun. Perhaps Johnson did not have a chance between when the intruder whipped it out and his friend got involved. Better, in my opinion, to have a clear shot on the BG, than shoot your friend in the struggle. I would rather live with the regret of loosing a friend, than the regret of killing a friend.
Hedgpeth says when the gunman drew his pistol, the man who lived in the apartment charged him. Shots were fired, and 35-year-old Tracy Moore was struck and killed.
After re-reading this, I'm not even sure that the guy who charged the BG is the one who was shot. It's oddly worded. I would have expected it to read "charged him and was shot and killed".
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
baldeagle wrote:I wonder what was going through Johnson's mind? Did he hesitate because he was afraid of being charged with a crime? Or did he think the situation would de-escalate somehow and deadly force would not be required? Had he pulled his gun immediately and shot the BG, his friend might still be alive. This makes me think that when you're confronted with an armed BG you should not hesitate in the hope that things will somehow work out. Thoughts?
First there is no way to know the timing or layout of the apartment so it's hard to second guess if the good guy could have drawn earlier. If the gun was out and covering him until the resident come back into the room drawing the bad guys attention, it can be difficult to draw from IWB sitting with a gun leveled at you already.
5th Generation Texan
"Republicrats and Demicans, it ain't no surprise,
Got their hands full of gimme, they got their mouths full of lies."
Like many of you have said you do, I run through my mind at times what I would do in certain situations where people are being shot. React immediately? Wait for a chance to use surprise to avoid "collateral damage"? Wait to be sure you know for sure the BG's are not undercover good guys? Wait until the BG's are positioned where I can establish a line of fire that can avoid collateral damage? If I wait, will a couple of unarmed guys rush the armed BG and get shot? I know I am capable of shooting in self defense if necessary. When things are developing in an imaginary scenario, the right time to react is often unclear. Comments on similar thoughts?
can2boy wrote:don't know if this one is here already. but yet another CHL holder shoots a would be robber. SURPRISE!!!! i'm armed. http://cbs11tv.com/local/mesquite.party ... 52686.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
My attorney will be contacting your attorney about the use of this phrase. :-)
SIA
N. Texas LTC's hold 3 breakfasts each month. All are 800 AM. OC is fine.
2nd Saturdays: Rudy's BBQ, N. Dallas Pkwy, N.bound, N. of Main St., Frisco.
3rd Saturdays: Golden Corral, 465 E. I-20, Collins St exit, Arlington.
4th Saturdays: Sunny St. Cafe, off I-20, Exit 415, Mikus Rd, Willow Park.
Those of us who have attended one of these prefer the term underground poker room.
I too am wondering if this was an illegal game. If it was, doesn't the GG now have a problem since the handgun was used during the commission of another crime? Even though placing of bets is a class C misdemeanor, the only exception to using a gun while engaged in the commission of a crime would be class c misdemeanors that are traffic control laws.
"All bleeding eventually stops.......quit whining!"
92f-fan wrote:AFAIK
unless the house was taking a cut it may have been legal
The crime is taking a rake from the winnings, not playing poker. There are a few places around here that run poker games several nights a week and either charge a cover, or membership fees. This is their way of skirting the law, don't know if there are all on the up and up, but the theory is if they don't make money from the actual wagers, they aren't profitting from the gambling itself. Heck, there is a place I know of that has scannable membership cards used to access the building, catering, and security gaurds.
Actually mentioning that they (Channel 11) are his employer serves two purposes. First it says: "We are reporting all the facts, including that we may be biased because he works with us." and secondly it says "Don't try this at Channel 11."
How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019