NY Judge says Hunters can be Jurors

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

NY Judge says Hunters can be Jurors

Post by WildBill »

NY Judge Frank LaBuda stopped the trial of a hunter who was charged with assault for shooting another hunter. The defense attorney issued peremptory challenges to six of 35 potential jurors who had identified themselves as hunters. Judge LaBuda ruled that the challenges amounted to a "systematic exclusion" of hunters which violated the Supreme Court's 1988 ruling in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1 ... udge_Finds" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar
jester
Senior Member
Posts: 505
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 8:52 pm
Location: Energy Capital of the World

Re: NY Judge says Hunters can be Jurors

Post by jester »

If both the accused and the victim are hunters, wouldn't a jury of their peers be comprised of hunters? :headscratch
"There is but one correct answer...and it is best delivered with a Winchester rifle."
User avatar
karl
Senior Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:54 am
Location: Houston

Re: NY Judge says Hunters can be Jurors

Post by karl »

So for my jury trial tomorrow for a traffic ticket, is the jury compromised by being comprised of drivers? "Hunters" is a very broad category.
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then. It is like a storm in the atmosphere. -Thomas Jefferson
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”