NY Judge Frank LaBuda stopped the trial of a hunter who was charged with assault for shooting another hunter. The defense attorney issued peremptory challenges to six of 35 potential jurors who had identified themselves as hunters. Judge LaBuda ruled that the challenges amounted to a "systematic exclusion" of hunters which violated the Supreme Court's 1988 ruling in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1 ... udge_Finds" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NY Judge says Hunters can be Jurors
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
NY Judge says Hunters can be Jurors
NRA Endowment Member
- jester
- Senior Member
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 8:52 pm
- Location: Energy Capital of the World
Re: NY Judge says Hunters can be Jurors
If both the accused and the victim are hunters, wouldn't a jury of their peers be comprised of hunters? 

"There is but one correct answer...and it is best delivered with a Winchester rifle."
Re: NY Judge says Hunters can be Jurors
So for my jury trial tomorrow for a traffic ticket, is the jury compromised by being comprised of drivers? "Hunters" is a very broad category.
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then. It is like a storm in the atmosphere. -Thomas Jefferson