Methodist Sugar Land

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
chuckybrown
Banned
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Fort Bend County, Texas

Methodist Sugar Land

Post by chuckybrown »

I went to the doctor this afternoon, who's office is in one of the Methodist buildings out here in Sugar Land. I've never stopped to study the CHL signs, but did so today. They're 30.06 posted with "51" designation.

Can someone explain to me how a hospital is claiming that they obtain 51% of their sales from alcohol?

Or, am I not understanding something?

Thanks!

Chucky-B
Chuckybrown
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Methodist Sugar Land

Post by sjfcontrol »

Rubbing Alcohol, maybe?

I seem to recall there was something at one time that required hospitals to post the equivalent of a 51% sign without the red 51% part. It seemed that some posted the actual 51% sign itself.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Methodist Sugar Land

Post by seamusTX »

This has been in the law since the beginning and hasn't changed. It's Government Code section 411.204, which requires hospitals to post the same sign as bars without the 51% overlay. In the case of hospitals it has nothing to do with selling alcoholic beverages.

The infamous PC 46.035(i) later required hospitals to also post 30.06 signs if they want to exclude CHL holders.

I''ve seen all kinds of imaginative variations on these signs.

- Jim
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Methodist Sugar Land

Post by sjfcontrol »

Thanks, Jim.
By the way, the "Rubbing Alcohol" quip was a joke. :mrgreen:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Methodist Sugar Land

Post by seamusTX »

I figured. ;-)

- Jim
speedsix
Senior Member
Posts: 5608
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:39 am

Re: Methodist Sugar Land

Post by speedsix »

...411.204 also specifies "...shall prominently display at each entrance..."...imagine that...
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”