Page 1 of 2

Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:26 pm
by tacticool
Over some cold adult beverages, a bunch of us were talking about the current crop of possible GOP candidates. Somebody suggested that the Republicans should court Hillary Clinton to switch parties. She's not much to the left of Romney, all things considered, and she could gain votes from many Democrats who supported Obama in 2008 but are now disappointed. What do you guys think?

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:42 pm
by The Annoyed Man
Republican candidate? You're joking, right?

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:45 pm
by Commander Cody
"rlol"

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:47 pm
by 74novaman
I'd like to see her primary Obama but if I'm not going to vote for a watered down dem like Romney, why would i vote for someone to the left of him?

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:48 pm
by chasfm11
tacticool wrote:Over some cold adult beverages, a bunch of us were talking about the current crop of possible GOP candidates. Somebody suggested that the Republicans should court Hillary Clinton to switch parties. She's not much to the left of Romney, all things considered, and she could gain votes from many Democrats who supported Obama in 2008 but are now disappointed. What do you guys think?
To come up with that, it must have been quite a few adult beverages. It would be one thing for her to run as a Democrat but as a Republican?

Then again, it isn't like she would be the first RINO. :banghead:

Sure, I'd vote for her....right after........... (think cold in a hot place)

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:07 pm
by tacticool
74novaman wrote:I'd like to see her primary Obama but if I'm not going to vote for a watered down dem like Romney, why would i vote for someone to the left of him?
That was one of the main points in the discussion. The biggest difference between Clinton and Romney that we could see was that she has a better chance of beating Obama.

I would really like the Republican Party to nominate a fiscal conservative but the rigged nature of the Republican primaries (not allowing all states an equal voice by voting at the same time) seems to knock out the good candidates by the time Texans get a voice. Is that coincidence or by design?

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:13 pm
by Keith B
I think you and your friends may have been doing more than just drinking. :headscratch

:lol:

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:21 pm
by tacticool
Keith B wrote:I think you and your friends may have been doing more than just drinking. :headscratch
I can neither confirm nor deny whether we were armed. :nono:

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:12 pm
by Pug
Change?

Image

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:45 pm
by Texas Dan Mosby
OP, for the love of all things holy, stop what you are doing right now, and IMMEDIATELY call 911, as you are obviously undergoing some kind of severe traumatic medical condition impacting your ability to think!

Seek help before it's too late!

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:58 pm
by AEA
tacticool wrote:Over some cold adult beverages, a bunch of us were talking about the current crop of possible GOP candidates.
You should consider giving up the adult beverages and find some new friends!

If this happened and she was elected, it would truly be the end of the USA as we know it. :shock:

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:55 pm
by MeMelYup
Sorry but I see her the same as our two newest supreme court justices!

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:50 pm
by Jasonw560
For the OP, I have some questions:
1) Did you experience a headache/throbbing in yoir head right before you submitted this post?
2) Any weakness to one side of your body?
3) Do you have a Lop-sided smle?
4) Did you notice, at any time, the smell of burnt toast?

All of these are a sign of a stroke. That could be an explanation to the post.

Re: Clinton 2012

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:21 pm
by Dragonfighter
Pug wrote:Change?

Image
Once I quit choking I realized...this is just wrong.

"rlol"