As soon as I heard this proposal, I was amazed. A value added tax (VAT) of 9% plus my state and local sales tax of 8.5%. That a 17.5% tax on most purchases. I don't think that will do much to stimulate the economy, given the doldrums it is in.
Last edited by RiverCity.45 on Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
9/21/09 - Received license
"Nothing is so dangerous as an idea when it is the only one you have." - Emile Chartier
Anytime you change the tax laws someone wins someone loses.
I generally don't like it when the tax law change and I lose. That seems to be almost all of the time.
My favorite was "Robinhood". Robinhood passed in Texas, my property taxes went up, Robinhood repealed, my property taxes went up. (I sure have noticed a lot of really big fancy high school football stadiums out in the far counties, since it was passed and repealed though)
Regan was the only time my taxes actually went down. But he made changes that caused my industry to go to hell in a handbag overnight, so my job suffered as a result.
Big tax changes have large unintended consequences.
We don't need radical "Change" we need gradual manipulation of the existing tax code to restore equality.
To me all income should be taxed the same.
Not one rate for sweat of the brow income and another rate for investment income. Income should only be taxed once. Dividend income should not be taxed because it has already been taxed at the corporate level. But why should only income be taxed? How about a small oil import tax. Helps the environment, helps the US oil business. How about a tax on imports from countries that do not have a social security and medicare tax equal to ours. Why should a local bookstore have to charge a sales tax and Amazon not.
But never a value added tax. Yeah I have been to Canada, half your bill is tax. It puts a real damper on spending, doing anything. Not good at all for the economy.
Sorry Mr. Cain, 999 sounds like I would pay more taxes, and Warren Buffet would pay less, and he really wants to pay more taxes, so pick him, not me.
philip964 wrote:Why should a local bookstore have to charge a sales tax and Amazon not.
Amazon would have to pay a national sales tax so you should like that. They don't have to pay local sales tax in places they're not local, but Texans who buy from Amazon are required by law to submit the tax because Amazon doesn't. http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/use/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Let's just burn the whole thing down and start over. I really don't see any other way. Start by requiring all lobbyists to wear a readily identifiable safety orange uniform with a large identifier across the back showing who they represent whenever they meet with a congressman. Congressmen required to wear readily identifiable lime green uniforms to all such meetings with their name/district/state and party on the back. All such meetings are to be held in a dedicated public room, with microphones for the lobbyist and congressmen, and speaker systems for any interested listeners. The events unfolding in this room to be broadcast 24/7 on streaming video.
Any spoken or written communications between congressmen and lobbyists to be felonies for both parties to the communications punishable by not less than 10 years in Leavenworth. Make it the only way to avoid being charged is if either the congressman or lobbyist receives any such illicit communications un-asked for. To invoke this protection, whichever party received the unsolicited communication must immediately report the other to the FBI, who will immediately affect an arrest.
To be exempt from these regulations, the person meeting with the congressmen must be a resident of that official's district.
I know, I know, probably half of that is unconstitutional, not to mention a pipe dream. But I would sure like to see all those back room deals get stomped flat.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
philip964 wrote:Why should a local bookstore have to charge a sales tax and Amazon not.
Amazon would have to pay a national sales tax so you should like that. They don't have to pay local sales tax in places they're not local, but Texans who buy from Amazon are required by law to submit the tax because Amazon doesn't. http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/use/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
How does Texas realistically expect to collect this tax?
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
The Annoyed Man wrote:Let's just burn the whole thing down and start over.
That's Cain's plan for federal taxes. I don't like his anti-McDonald position on guns but I like the sound of the 9-9-9 plan if it totally replaces FIT and FICA and there's really no exemptions, no deductions, no loopholes, no sheet.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
philip964 wrote:Why should a local bookstore have to charge a sales tax and Amazon not.
Amazon would have to pay a national sales tax so you should like that. They don't have to pay local sales tax in places they're not local, but Texans who buy from Amazon are required by law to submit the tax because Amazon doesn't. http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/use/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
How does Texas realistically expect to collect this tax?
The expect all honest citizens to calculate the tax, and then just send it in... Oh, wait, you said "realistically"... Nevermind...
(The real answer is, "They Don't!")
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target." Never Forget.
Don't forget, that's calculated as tax on tax. State and Local first=Total+National Sales Tax ON TOP OF the others!
The people this will REALLY HURT is Social Security recipients who have to live on a fixed income that has not even had a COL increase in over 2 years!
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only. Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1 1911's RULE!
RiverCity.45 wrote:So how many of you are willing to pay an additional 9% on nearly everything you purchase??
You can't look at this tax in isolation....
If it was implemented as proposed, your Medicare and Social Security taxes would go away.... your paycheck would get bigger
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.! Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
RiverCity.45 wrote:So how many of you are willing to pay an additional 9% on nearly everything you purchase??
You can't look at this tax in isolation....
If it was implemented as proposed, your Medicare and Social Security taxes would go away.... your paycheck would get bigger
That's true for people who have a paycheck. What about those that don't? Such as SS recipients I mentioned above (13+ Million) and anyone else out of work?
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only. Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1 1911's RULE!
We're a nation of 300 million people.
We need to account for fixed income people and unemployed in the equation certainly. But what we have now is an undeniable disaster. Let's not toss out any idea that doesn't immediately cover every single need. 999 is an interesting place to start a discussion. Leaving the current tax paradigm in place is unacceptable.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.! Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek