Gun control reignited
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:44 pm
Yet another article by some "Newbie" young Liberal who has not studied history, yet pretends to know the "reasons" for amendments being passed, and acts as if an amendment actually "gives" a "fundamental" right which pre-existed the original document which had the amendment added.
You can comment if you have a Facebook
Gun control reignited
Posted: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:36 am
http://www.tristate-media.com/warrick/o ... 963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Armed people are tougher to control, so, people who want to control want the edge of knowing you are not armed.
Common Sense and "control" used in the sense of wanting you to believe it's common sense to disarm so another can control you ... is not logical unless you have some odd desire to be at another's mercy and powerless..It is not "common sense" to want to handle rattlesnakes without your snakeproof gloves on so that the snake has the edge, or to walk on hot coals without the protection afforded by shoes, .... that's stupidity, not "common sense"
In what universe is it "common sense" to desire to become more vulnerable to harm and defenseless and HAVE TO submit to the will of another who can harm you and your family? ... Some Liberals need dictionaries and reality checks.
You can comment if you have a Facebook
Gun control reignited
Posted: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 9:36 am
http://www.tristate-media.com/warrick/o ... 963f4.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I just have problems accepting that some person with less knowledge and a lower IQ has the common sense I'd trust to allow them the right to control me. I have had armed criminals control me before, why does this random person writing the article want to control others?Let us support common sense controls on CGO (Civilian Gun Ownership) ...
Armed people are tougher to control, so, people who want to control want the edge of knowing you are not armed.
Common Sense and "control" used in the sense of wanting you to believe it's common sense to disarm so another can control you ... is not logical unless you have some odd desire to be at another's mercy and powerless..It is not "common sense" to want to handle rattlesnakes without your snakeproof gloves on so that the snake has the edge, or to walk on hot coals without the protection afforded by shoes, .... that's stupidity, not "common sense"
In what universe is it "common sense" to desire to become more vulnerable to harm and defenseless and HAVE TO submit to the will of another who can harm you and your family? ... Some Liberals need dictionaries and reality checks.